Search results

Experiments in both Dubna and Darmstadt use detectors made in Poland to analyze decay products: http://www.ite.waw.pl/docs/en/others/GSI_Element_114_at_TASCA_Poster_small.pdf http://press.ite.waw.pl/pdf/2012/ITE120529a_-_Silicon_strip_detectors.pdf

https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/

(Note the one at the bottom regarding the Bitlocker password being stored in your Microsoft OneDrive account)

If M31 was brighter:

Yes, that looks like a mushroom cloud seen from an oblique angle. BUT, an image sensor is usually pointed at nadir. So it would be looking at the mushroom cloud top-down, not from the side. So even if a mushroom cloud was there, that's now how it would look. So to me it looks like a crater...

And, since O-H is hosted in US, it is exempted from copyright infringement liability simply if it honores such takedown requests, per 17 USC 512 (c)(1)(A)(iii). Also note that the only person entitled to file a takedown request is a copyright holder or a duly authorized agent thereof -- 17 USC...

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5495_en.htm

Flyby view: http://i.imgur.com/zVM8VVQ.gifv

MOAR PIX: http://www.isro.gov.in/pslv-c25-mars-orbiter-mission/pictures-mars-colour-camera-mcc-onboard-india%E2%80%99s-mars-orbiter

More to the point, in Orbiter interaction between mesh and code is done only through SDK API which means that the legal tests for derived work will fail.

Nonsense. Read both the license and the law. Mesh is not code. See RedHat/CentOS for prior example of combining non-GPL artwork with GPL code.

Thank you!

And there's even less need for that since KSP got Realism Overhaul: https://github.com/KSP-RO/RealismOverhaul/wiki

Hi Xyon, The current problem on OH is that there is a ton of add-ons which don't have specified any distribution terms. It would be very beneficial to give uploaders a choice of standard licenses like this: - ( ) public domain - authorship acknowledgement: ( ) MIT ( ) CC-BY - copyleft: ( )...

Submarines, typically, don't travel over land.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B643ntN4WxBVNnc5enFPU0VUZVpLY2tJWFgwWWhoTEcyTkV3/view?pli=1

Installed Windows 10 and started Orbiter. I've found that Orbiter dialog boxes don't have the "x" displayed on them, but they do close if I click where the "x" should be:

Oh, neither did I. But you have correctly identified that there is a problem with license of SDK samples. Now: what about trying to fix this?

And all it would take to fix this is ask Mr. Schweiger to issue license clarification for SDK samples. Why don't you go ahead and do this instead of arguing with me? We're both under civil law, actually. And copyright law in basic aspects is the same everywhere.

But that has nothing to do with GPL. I'm responsing to the argument that GPL should not be used for Orbiter add-ons, because linking to the non-free core causes non-compliance with the GPL. My answer to that is: even if it were causing non-compliance (which I stronly doubt), so what? If it's...