Search results

CTD at EDS separation... :( Sugestion: Instead of [PAYLOAD_0] MESHNAME="Altair" NAME=Altair OFF=(0,0,22.61) MASS=45000 MODULE=spacecraft/spacecraft3 SPEED=(0,0,0) ROT_SPEED=(0,0,0) Deifne the Altair as: [PAYLOAD_0] MESHNAME="Altair_descent;altair_Ascent" NAME=Altair...

My space vision is more International/Commercial friendly, but also keeps NASA's role as US astronaut launcher. All the enterprises are of shared risk 51% Governement and 49% Private. It will require one or two levels of international cooperation stronger than the achieved at ISS. Details...

Hi Columbia42: The meshes and modified config file are here. The title of the file says everithing :P Good Luck :hello:

Ehr... Aren't LC 40/LC 41 surface bases???

9.81 is the accurate form 10 is the approximate form :P

Easy form: Multiply by 10.0 and write the result :P Easy form: Multiply by 9.81 and write the result :P

We deliver... COTS to ISS. Orbital TAURUS 2 :P

An advantage of Velcro Rockets is that you shouldn't use a spacecraft3 vessel for the second stage. Docking is supported :D Columbia42. Do you need something else appart of the fairing Meshes? :P

Yup and... yup The only thing is the Fairing Meshes. I hope having them ready tomorrow or tuesday :P

Francisdrake's... :P

Dougkeenan's Jupiter DIRECT employs this idea... true? Well, Columbia42, take note :P Now i'm exporting the fairing meshes :P

For the first... yup. It's the Most Up-to-date available. For the second... i'll test first your beta, for seing if my fairing meshes fit well, and later i'll send you :P EDIT: See the fairing... how does it seem to you? :P

Well... for doin' your mouth water. Read the (scarce) info that i could achieve. Performance: 110 tons in 220 km x 220 km x 65° Booster Engines: 4 "enlarged Zenits": 4 x Energomash RD 170 Core Engine: 1 x "enlarged Atlas 5 CCB/Rus M URB": 1 x Energomash RD 180 Second Stage: 1 X Khimavtomatiki...

It is in process of development. I'll release it by demand :P It's an enourmus launcher (a little more powerful than Jupiter DIRECT series), but the information about it is almost inexistent.

Does somebody need a Russian-made superheavy launcher?

Other solutions before see you fightin' fist-to-fist: 1- Use Velcro for attaching the Fairing and the Escape Tower 2- Pod-sad-ka :P

For easing the calculus: 490N It's the average thrust of the venerable R4D-15 engine. NASA is not too stupid for wasting time for developing a new RCS engine :P

Hmmm!!! That info could help a lot! I should have read the manual :beathead: ... and i believe that Chameleon needs too. Mainly because the scenarios with Proton 2.0 should require a complete redesign to .scn file. Suggestion to Chamaleon: In addition of your 7K-L1... Why don't try the...

Well, i'll try to explain you: You've tested your 7K-L1 in a Multistage library based Proton Launch Vehicle V1.0 by Thornton, true? Well, i have the Proton Launch Vehicle V1.0 by Thornton and for me, the 7K-L1 worked well. The problem is if someone uses the Proton Launch Vehicle V2.0 by...