Since you mentioned the MPS and Aero Slews, will we able to do the SSME REPO procedure with 2.0? THe reason I mention both is that the despite the procedure name, the post-landing SSME REPO procedure actually moves both the SSMEs and the aerosurfaces to full down as can be seen here:
I've had STS-109 in the works for some time, but decided to pause work on it as for proper operations I need DPS access and all three SSPs (L12 and L12U) as well as advanced control of the CCTV system for the FSS Berthing Camera.
No, that would be these: https://www.orbiter-forum.com/threads/new-global-textures-and-night-lights-level-11-version.43597/
And for the Cape textures, it would be Map 1.
IIRC from way back, it was a hack, more of trial run thay never worked properly and messed with the flight models in a non realistic way.
This is similar to another removed feature that Orbiter used have back in the day, which was actual lens glare whenever tje Sun was in the FOV. It was...
Currently the atmospheric winds implementation is very flawed and doesn't work right. If there's no desire to implement a proper simulation of them, then they along with the checkbox for them in the Launchpad should be removed entirely. GitHub ticket link...
Seeing as that you're part of the flight crew in SSV, you wouldn't be able to hear the PAO loop as it is transmitted on its own frequency, separate from KSC OIS (Operational Intercommunications System) channel 212 and the A/Gs that the crew is tied into. Same reason why we as the audience...
This is a thread to discuss the implementation of new and more improved joystick/gamepad support in Orbiter as the current one is old and doesn't support newer and more advanced units such as the X-52 HOTAS. GitHub ticket link: https://github.com/orbitersim/orbiter/issues/541
When is improvements to GNC and APU/hydraulic systems planned for? Would like to have a fully working ADI and given that the APU/hydraulic system is by far the oldest system in SSV (it dates back to the original Space Shuttle Deluxe in 2007) I think it needs some attention.
Maybe profit was never the reason, but the same schedule pressure was certainly there. Apollo 1, STS-51L and STS-107, they all had serious schedule pressure pushing them. Apollo 1 had the political pressure of beating the Soviets and landing on the Moon before the end of the decade. STS-51L was...
Well, New Glenn exploded on the pad tonight during the planned hot fire test. After an aborted attempt 2 hours earlier, the 7 BE-4 engines of the first stage (GS-1) ignited at 9 pm EDT (0100 UTC May 29) which was followed by the vehicle exploding, seeming taking its Transporter/Erector with it.
While on the subject of payloads: How are you planning to to handle Spacelab? I just wonder because the Spacelab tunnel used its own custom bridge rail panels for the trunnion pins. Currently there's no way to specify this.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.