Project 2001 Discovery One (book)

rseferino

Orbiter amateur filmmaker
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Caracas, Venezuela
Website
www.facebook.com
I be working on my first project: Discovery One version of the book.

According 2001 A Space Odyssey:

The spherical pressure hull formed the head of a flimsy, arrow-shaped structure more than a hundred yards long. Discovery, like all vehicles intended for deep space penetration, was too fragile and unstreamlined ever to enter an atmosphere, or to defy the full gravitational field of any planet. She had been assembled in orbit around the Earth, tested on a translunar maiden flight, and finally checked out in orbit above the Moon.

She was a creature of pure space - and she looked it. Immediately behind the pressure hull was grouped a cluster of four large liquid hydrogen tanks - and beyond them, forming a long, slender V, were the radiating fins that dissipated the waste heat of the nuclear reactor. Veined with a delicate tracery of pipes for the cooling fluid, they looked like the wings of some vast dragonfly, and from certain angles gave Discovery a fleeting resemblance to an old-time sailing ship,

At the very end of the V, three hundred feet from the crew-compartment, was the shielded inferno of the reactor, and the complex of focusing electrodes through which emerged the incandescent star-stuff of the plasma drive. This had done its work weeks ago, forcing Discovery out of her parking orbit round the Moon. Now the reactor was merely ticking over as it generated electrical power for the ship's services, and the great radiating fins, that would glow cherry red when Discovery was accelerating under maximum thrust, were dark and cool.
With this and other loose notes in the book I did this:

48267585.jpg


I draw on a small image:

discoveryone.jpg


It's my first design, so it still has many weaknesses.
 
Nice.:)
It's cool to see the pre movie model because this version is somewhat different as the Discovery in the film.
 
Yes, there are other drawings of it floating around out there, I'm surprised noone has built the addon before.

Something you should keep in mind if you are doing the book version is that Bowman landed on one of Saturn's moons in the book prior to his rendezvous with the Monolith, IIRC, so you might want to modify at least one of the pods to have a descent and landing gear, maybe a descent stage and an ascent motor.
 
Yes, there are other drawings of it floating around out there, I'm surprised noone has built the addon before.

Something you should keep in mind if you are doing the book version is that Bowman landed on one of Saturn's moons in the book prior to his rendezvous with the Monolith, IIRC, so you might want to modify at least one of the pods to have a descent and landing gear, maybe a descent stage and an ascent motor.

Iapetus was the moon. And the black spot was the monolith. I don't know exactly if the pods had landing gear.
 
Iapetus has no atmosphere so the pod doesn't need a heat shield. I guess the pod should be the same as the ones in this addon ( [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=891"]2001 / 2010 Space Odyssey Vessels[/ame] ) except with a hover engine on the bottom and retractable landing gear.
 
I have the "Prototype" Discovery One.

I have to work to reduce number of polygons, especially in the section of the sphere of the crew, doors to the pods (in the book to be two), complete the AE35 antenna assembly, and improved plasma engine.

I do not handle well the textures, so it will, for the moment, only "paint"

091213165326discovery1.jpg

091213165330discovery1.jpg
091213165344discovery1.jpg
 
It looks very nice.:)
Have you a date when you want to put it out?
 
Maybe halfway through the next month or sooner. I have already tested in orbit and it works very good. It's my first project and I'm slow, but to have it ready I'll put a beta version so others orbinauts tested and found bugs.
 
It looks very good indeed, somewhere I have a copy of Piers Bizony's book on 2001 which has some sketches of the various incarnations of Discovery before the final version was decided on.

Apparently the reason the radiators from the 'dragonfly' were dropped was that everyone kept seeing them as wings.

I'd love to give this one a beta test when the opportunity arises.
 
Last edited:
Looks good :thumbup: A possible plus might be some texturing, but it looks fine as it is. I think that the real thing here is the landing on Iapetus. If you can make the pod/lander to fly well in that role, I'd be more than happy. :)
 
Got to jump in here, considering how fond I have always been of both the book *and* the movie. And yes, I am of the generation that could well "appreciate" the psychedelic slant of the movie's ending..

:cheers:

Bowman never landed the pod on Iapetus. He was considering setting the pod down on the top of the monolith discovered there, but before he could it opened up, and, well:

"The thing's hollow - it goes on forever - and - oh my God! - it's full of stars!"
 
He trying landing "over" the monolith. The gravity on Iapetus is 1 / 38 G, so it is possible that the pod is suspended over the monolith. I doing tests with the [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=891"]original pod[/ame] if I add hover engines, it's could.
 
I found my copy of the book '2001, Filming the Future' by Piers Bizony. The sketches of the various incarnations of Discovery considered for the film are between pages 92-95 and include both a 'Dragonfly' version clearly based on the book, though somewhat different in appearance and a 'Project Orion' based Discovery.

The book did not scan well, but I was able to do both pages 92-93 which I've attached below.
 

Attachments

  • DiscP1.jpg
    DiscP1.jpg
    122.6 KB · Views: 55
  • DiscP2.jpg
    DiscP2.jpg
    121.6 KB · Views: 60
He planed to, though, if I remember correctly.

That's always bothered me a bit, because as I remember it, what he planned wasn't very well specified. And the pod, as is, really can't land. So, unless you assume the book pod had landing gear and hover thrusters, this is a bit of an authorial mistake. The only thing Bowman could have done is what DID happen; he flies over Iapetus, and falls into the stargate before his lack of landing thrusters becomes an issue....
 
I don't recall if Clark specified all the details and design of the pods in the book, they may have been equipped for a landing. I assume so, else he likely wouldn't have written the story that way.

Not very often you see Clark make a mistake, but he did make a big one now and then, as we have seen from Orbinauts trying to recreate the scenario in Rendezvous with Rama in Orbiter and finding out the numbers don't add up.
 
I would also point out that the book was written based on notes made during the making of the film. Technicaly, the book was written after the movie. The differences between the two are compromises that had to be taken in order to work for the movie. The biggest one is the change from Jupiter (in the movie) and Saturn (in the book). Since Voyayer 1 had yet to be launched the movie makers felt that they could not reproduce Saturn in a convincing way and have it hold water after Voyager. Clarke mentions this in the Authors Note in 2010 book.
 
I would also point out that the book was written based on notes made during the making of the film. Technicaly, the book was written after the movie.

Not quite so. It was RELEASED after the movie, however writing the book and writing the movie was more or less a co-developement. At least the basic manuscript of the book was finished before the movie-script was written (Kubrick more or less hired Clarke to write the story for him). At least the introduction of my copy says so.

As far as the pods are concerned, in the book they knew from the beginning that the monolith was on Iapetus' surface, so it wouldn't make much sense to dispatch a manned science mission that has no possibility to land. From that point of view, it would only make sense that the pods had indeed some rudimentary landing gear and hovers (considering Iapetus' gravity, they wouldn't have to be very strong).
 
Back
Top