"Iron Sky" 3rd trailer

[dougkeenan]

 

[Donamy]

Need another option, 'don't know'.

 

[dougkeenan]

Rats, can't figure out how to edit the poll. Abstain ... ?

 

[Krikkit]

I had been waiting for this movie for five years. I actually forgot it existed. Glad to see they are finally filming it.

Looks a little campy, like a b-reel sci-fi, but I like those kinds of movies. It will probably be worth a watch.

 

[dougkeenan]

Dynamite addon(s). More talent than I possess, alas.

 

[Eli13]

new option please: "meh...."

 

[theflyingfish]

It has potential. The CGI talent is obviously there. It's success will hinge on the acting and writing quality. I am guessing the general premise is that when Germany lost WWII, they fled to the moon and began secretly building a massive strike force to retake the world. Seems pretty cool, especially since the attack is called a Meteorblitzkrieg. If I saw that many Nazi spaceships re-entering at once, i would find myself a nice, deep coal mine to hide in until things cooled down. I like the zeppelin-like look of the large mother-ships. A clever ploy to revitalize the whole WWII-war-movie genre.

 

[Star Voyager]

The blonde in the beginning looks really nice. I just might see this movie now that I saw her...ON THE MOON (which only heightens her beauty)!

 

[Eli13]

But the gravity didn't seem to be modeled, at all actually...

 

[dougkeenan]

Yeah, even Stanley didn't get that one right.

 

[jedidia]

Well, their Nazis at least speak a better german than George Lucase's, at least... :lol:

 

[dougkeenan]

Well, their Nazis at least speak a better german than George Lucase's, at least... :lol:

Udo Kier helps elevate my optimism for the project.

 

[indonesianorbinaut]

sub-human :rofl:

 

[Turbinator]

Didn't even know of this. Thanks for the post. Awesome movie.

 

[Ghostrider]

CGI is good enough, acting seems professional enough. I don't care how campy a movie is if it's well acted and produced.

 

[Scruce]

This movie would be awesome if it wasn't a comedy.

 

[Scruce]

Bump for a good reason, the film opened in Finland and Germany's cinemas four days ago. I don't know if it will get as far as United Kingdom or United States cinemas, though.

The plot is also up on Wikipedia:
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Sky"]Iron Sky[/ame]

 

[garyw]

These are the guys who did Star Wreck which, considering the budget and locations they used was absolutely brilliant.

I hope this is a major win for them because the film industry needs some fresh ideas and talent.

 

[mojoey]

Ok, minor nitpick here...in the trailer, the Space Zepplins were in orbit over florida, and they were facing north, that would indicate, that, unless they did some turning, they are in a polar orbit, and the moon isn't in a polar orbit... :2cents:

 

[Scruce]

Ok, minor nitpick here...in the trailer, the Space Zepplins were in orbit over florida, and they were facing north, that would indicate, that, unless they did some turning, they are in a polar orbit, and the moon isn't in a polar orbit... :2cents:

No matter which way space works in that movie, that statement is incorrect.

If space works in the normal, real way; then orientation changes nothing because I could orient a satellite to face 'in the up' direction which would not change anything related to the directional velocity (unless we count drag, but that's a completely different matter).

If space works in the fake, Star Trek way; then orientation does not matter as the spacecraft are under the 'hover' effect; where no spacecraft are affected by the gravitational pull of the parent body.

TL;DR Summary: What you are doing, mojoey, is applying the plane-change factor into a simulated universe where there is no such thing as a plane-change factor.