Like they're not already... :dry:I seriously think that it is time for NASA to get a new launch vehicle finally.
Like they're not already... :dry:I seriously think that it is time for NASA to get a new launch vehicle finally.
Its sort of the which takes priority the unmanned or manned mission arguement that has been going on for ages.I am really delighted to learn that the launch of LRO is no longer delayed now because of the shuttle. LRO is going to be a really exciting mission.
Engineers Narrow In on Cause of Endeavour Hydrogen Leak
Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:40:29 PM GMT
Space Shuttle Program Manager John Shannon says engineers believe they now understand why a hydrogen gas vent line has been leaking, causing shuttle Endeavour's STS-127 mission to be postponed twice. He says a plate that attaches the vent line to Endeavour's external fuel tank is slightly misaligned and that's allowing a small leak to happen during the fueling process.
Teams at NASA Kennedy Space Center's Launch Pad 39A are taking precise measurements of the attaching plate during the weekend before crews disassemble it, realign the plate and install a new set of seals to fix the leak. Shannon also says technicians are preparing to test the repair plan by filling Endeavour's external tank with liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen in the next week and a half, just as they would for a launch. This "tanking test" will confirm whether the repairs will work before another launch attempt is made. Hydrogen leaks in the vent line postponed Endeavour's launch attempts June 13 and 17, delaying its 16-day flight to the International Space Station. If the repairs are successful, Endeavour's next launch attempt is targeted for July 11 at 7:39 p.m. EDT.
At NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, STS-127’s seven astronauts are taking the weekend off before resuming their mission training Monday
Who would have ever thought hydrogen valves needed alignment? Live and learn.
Might is the appropriate word since the evidence is contrary to your speculation:I think this whole issue is just an example of why jobs should be done properly the first time around.
If an investigation had been done after the STS-119 hydrogen leak, the issue may well have been found then, and Endeavour might be in space now.
engineers believe Endeavour's problem is a one-time issue related to this particular external tank. A spare vent line carrier plate was attached to external tanks currently in production and no similar clocking problems were found
Comments like these always annoy me. One of the (many) reasons why projects fail is because managers/directors expect people to be infallible. Yes, it would be better if all jobs are done properly the first time around, but if you expect this to be the case when you set out then you are destined to fail. Humans are fallible and will make mistakes somewhere along the lines - it's just a fact you have to accept. This is why there should always be procedures in place to detect/fix the problem should they arise - just as the launch checks detected the leak before the launch and resulted in a scrub.I think this whole issue is just an example of why jobs should be done properly the first time around.
I take that back:If there are no "clocking" issues with tanks currently in production then it is unlikely there is a tooling issue and, on balance of probabilities, it is likely that past leaks were also unrelated.
Still, I don't think NASA can be criticised on this issue. If this root cause analysis had all been done at STS-119, STS-127 would still likely have been delayed into July. I think the work that went on with the GH2 FCV's prior to STS-119 shows that NASA is well committed to having a safe vehicle.This problem has been found with six other tanks set to fly, although the misalignment on ET-131 is classed as “the worst”.
Its not. The structure you see there on the outside of the external tank is the Ground Umbilical Carrier Plate (GUCP). What has been covered up is the gaseous hydrogen (GH2) quick disconnect (QD) socket. Mostly likely to prevent contamination.Why is there GUP covered up?
Entirely correct. The glossy green area behind the gray GUCP is the External Tank Carrier Assembly(ETCA) which is the umbilical on the tank to which the GUCP is mated to when it is in the VAB vertical checkout cell.Its not. The structure you see there on the outside of the external tank is the Ground Umbilical Carrier Plate (GUCP). What has been covered up is the gaseous hydrogen (GH2) quick disconnect (QD) socket. Mostly likely to prevent contamination.
Sorry that sentence doesn't quite make sense to me, so here is my interpretation: the ECTA is fixed to the ET structure; the GH2 QD socket is mounted in the ECTA; the QD plug is mounted in the GUCP; the GUCP is mated to the ECTA which mates the QD plug and socket. (Very "Dem Bones" isnt it, sing: The thigh bone is connected to the hip bone... Dem bones gonna walk around...The glossy green area behind the gray GUCP is the External Tank Carrier Assembly(ETCA) when is the umbilical on the tank to which the GUCP is mated to when it is in the VAB vertical checkout cell.
Just noticed the wording error:Sorry that sentence doesn't quite make sense to me, so here is my interpretation: the ECTA is fixed to the ET structure; the GH2 QD socket is mounted in the ECTA; the QD plug is mounted in the GUCP; the GUCP is mated to the ECTA which mates the QD plug and socket. (Very "Dem Bones" isnt it, sing: The thigh bone is connected to the hip bone... Dem bones gonna walk around...)
Is the ECTA is mounted to the ET in the VAB, not MAF?
Yes, thank you.I hope that makes more sense.