RGClark
Mathematician
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1,635
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Website
- exoscientist.blogspot.com
Excellent points made in this lecture by Jeff Greason of XCOR that commercial space can get us to the Moon and Mars orders of magnitude more cheaply than the NASA estimates.
This is important because supporters of a "Mars first" approach such as Robert Zubrin take that stance because of the idea a lunar return would cost hundreds of billions of dollars. But this is by following the usual governmental financing approach. By following commercial space and not requiring all new "giga"-rockets, it could be done for a fraction of those estimates.
Then all Mars supporters would come on board to support a return to the Moon.
NewSpace 2014 - Pathways to Human Exploration: Are there alternatives to NASA? - YouTube
A new study concluded the cost for a lunar colony could be cut by an order of magnitude over NASA estimates by following the commercial space approach:
COLONIZING THE MOON MAY BE 90 PERCENT CHEAPER THAN WE THOUGHT
AND THAT IN TURN COULD HELP US GET TO MARS, SAYS NASA-COMMISSIONED STUDY
By Sarah Fecht Posted July 20, 2015
http://www.popsci.com/colonizing-moon-may-be-90-percent-cheaper-we-thought
Bob Clark