blane
Deep Space Operator
Since getting back into Orbiter I stumbled over a lot of issues and solutions, as usual if you like tons of addons.
Sometimes it is easy to notice a simple fix for some issue, let me use [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3251"]Deepstar 2.0[/ame] as an example here. It works fine in 2010P1 if the dll files in the root directory are removed. For convenience I changed the mod in my folder structure and also uploaded it (http://wikisend.com/download/753802/Deepstar 2.0.2010.rar)
Now my question is: How should such repacks be handled in general? It's not my addon so I wouldn't submit it, but is it okay to point others to such links for convenience? As another example check the Brighton Beach 2011 thread. It's clear that an addon developer doesn't want to mix it, but what are the unspoken policies of providing "all-in-one-packs" for convenience?
Sometimes it is easy to notice a simple fix for some issue, let me use [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3251"]Deepstar 2.0[/ame] as an example here. It works fine in 2010P1 if the dll files in the root directory are removed. For convenience I changed the mod in my folder structure and also uploaded it (http://wikisend.com/download/753802/Deepstar 2.0.2010.rar)
Now my question is: How should such repacks be handled in general? It's not my addon so I wouldn't submit it, but is it okay to point others to such links for convenience? As another example check the Brighton Beach 2011 thread. It's clear that an addon developer doesn't want to mix it, but what are the unspoken policies of providing "all-in-one-packs" for convenience?