- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 674
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- in the cold Denmark
- Website
- www.jelstudio.dk
Thanks.
Jane Musgrave doesn't really clarify it further though.
I don't say he did "steal" it. I say it is likely he just took the camera. And this doesn't even mean he took it whilst being aware that it could end in a law suit some day. Maybe he just took it in believe he can do so because it was returned home along with other souveniers.
Nobody can prove it is unlikely he just took it. Remember that NASA actually claims he owns it illegaly/without being officially transfered. Also, in case Mitchell would have been willing to return it when they already asked, NASA would not have to file a law suit I guess.
Nice try though as for allegations of criminal activity from my side :tiphat:
I read your post as if you thought he stole it, but I'm glad to see that I was wrong
If he didn't steel it, obviously there's no case. Cause if he didn't steel the camera, he's obviously the legal owner of it.
But they were made obviously. Mitchell admited this regarding both German and English language news articles.
Don't trust everything you read in the paper