OrbitHangar
Addon Comments
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,832
- Reaction score
- 18
- Points
- 0
OHM BEAM version 2
- Thread starter OrbitHangar
- Start date
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
Nice! I'll download it when I get home in the morning.
Kyle
Armchair Astronaut
Thank you Don!!
Interceptor
Well-known member
Thanks Don,awesome,I can't wait to try it out.
pappy2
Active member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 43
Hello "DON"
I have a display problem BEAM Module
(With the old version everything was fine)
He must remove the old version?
or install v2 over and overwrite files?
Nothing with BEAMv2 I have no textures display module
I have a display problem BEAM Module
(With the old version everything was fine)
He must remove the old version?
or install v2 over and overwrite files?
Nothing with BEAMv2 I have no textures display module
Last edited:
Donamy
Addon Developer
Hello "DON"
I have a display problem BEAM Module
(With the old version everything was fine)
He must remove the old version?
or install v2 over and overwrite files?
Nothing with BEAMv2 I have no textures display module
Does anyone else have this problem ?
---------- Post added at 10:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 PM ----------
Post what you have for the BEAM in your scenario. The old and new shouldn't conflict.
hutchison66
Donator
Beam version2
Hi there, just checked the Beam on my ISS and it works fine and I'm running windows 8 with Nvidia graphics card it runs fine, looks great a lot better than the original Thanks Don great job
Hi there, just checked the Beam on my ISS and it works fine and I'm running windows 8 with Nvidia graphics card it runs fine, looks great a lot better than the original Thanks Don great job
pappy2
Active member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 43
Hello
Sorry for my bad English.
With the old version of the BEAM 23/01/2013 everything was OK
With the new version V2 23/03/2016 BEAM BEAM module is not visible (with or without D3D9)
I tested with a simple scenario below suprimant maximum modules (download BEAMv2 today)
Right, BEAM exists but is not visible!
BEGIN_DESC
END_DESC
BEGIN_ENVIRONMENT
System Sol
Date MJD 55757.8159974841
Context SSU
END_ENVIRONMENT
BEGIN_FOCUS
Ship Tranquility
END_FOCUS
BEGIN_CAMERA
TARGET Tranquility
MODE Extern
POS 21.70 -88.57 148.47
TRACKMODE TargetRelative
FOV 33.24
END_CAMERA
BEGIN_HUD
TYPE Surface
END_HUD
BEGIN_MFD Left
TYPE Map
REF Earth
POS 0.00 0.00
END_MFD
BEGIN_SHIPS
Zarya:ISSR\Zarya
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554166.21 -1232272.40 5586376.95
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
AFCMODE 7
PRPLEVEL 0:0.500000 1:0.500000
DOCKINFO 1:1,Unity
NAVFREQ 0 0
XPDR 161
ANT 0 1.0000 1
CAM 1
SOL_DEP 1 0.3127 0
ControlMode 1
SOL_ST 0.0000 0
MSSTATE 1
LIGHT 1 0
BATTERY 66715.1311 66.7151
SHOWDATA 1
END
Tranquility:spacecraft\spacecraft3
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554160.92 -1232259.96 5586382.23
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 105.53 -37.05 138.68
VROT -0.00 -0.00 0.06
ATTACHED 2:2,Unity
AFCMODE 7
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 2 0.999604
SEQ 1 -2 0.000000
SEQ 2 2 0.999160
SEQ 3 2 0.998663
END
Unity:spacecraft\spacecraft3
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554158.80 -1232265.10 5586382.44
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
AFCMODE 7
DOCKINFO 1:1,Zarya
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 -2 0.000000
SEQ 1 -2 0.896926
SEQ 2 2 0.000493
SEQ 3 2 0.998600
END
BEAM:spacecraft/spacecraft3 NO GOOD
Bigelow/BEAM:spacecraft/spacecraft3 IT'S GOOD
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554163.25 -1232259.88 5586380.78
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
ATTACHED 0:2,Tranquility
AFCMODE 7
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 -2 0.000000
END
END_SHIPS
BEGIN_ExtMFD
END
Sorry for my bad English.
With the old version of the BEAM 23/01/2013 everything was OK
With the new version V2 23/03/2016 BEAM BEAM module is not visible (with or without D3D9)
I tested with a simple scenario below suprimant maximum modules (download BEAMv2 today)
Right, BEAM exists but is not visible!
BEGIN_DESC
END_DESC
BEGIN_ENVIRONMENT
System Sol
Date MJD 55757.8159974841
Context SSU
END_ENVIRONMENT
BEGIN_FOCUS
Ship Tranquility
END_FOCUS
BEGIN_CAMERA
TARGET Tranquility
MODE Extern
POS 21.70 -88.57 148.47
TRACKMODE TargetRelative
FOV 33.24
END_CAMERA
BEGIN_HUD
TYPE Surface
END_HUD
BEGIN_MFD Left
TYPE Map
REF Earth
POS 0.00 0.00
END_MFD
BEGIN_SHIPS
Zarya:ISSR\Zarya
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554166.21 -1232272.40 5586376.95
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
AFCMODE 7
PRPLEVEL 0:0.500000 1:0.500000
DOCKINFO 1:1,Unity
NAVFREQ 0 0
XPDR 161
ANT 0 1.0000 1
CAM 1
SOL_DEP 1 0.3127 0
ControlMode 1
SOL_ST 0.0000 0
MSSTATE 1
LIGHT 1 0
BATTERY 66715.1311 66.7151
SHOWDATA 1
END
Tranquility:spacecraft\spacecraft3
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554160.92 -1232259.96 5586382.23
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 105.53 -37.05 138.68
VROT -0.00 -0.00 0.06
ATTACHED 2:2,Unity
AFCMODE 7
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 2 0.999604
SEQ 1 -2 0.000000
SEQ 2 2 0.999160
SEQ 3 2 0.998663
END
Unity:spacecraft\spacecraft3
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554158.80 -1232265.10 5586382.44
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
AFCMODE 7
DOCKINFO 1:1,Zarya
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 -2 0.000000
SEQ 1 -2 0.896926
SEQ 2 2 0.000493
SEQ 3 2 0.998600
END
BEAM:spacecraft/spacecraft3 NO GOOD
Bigelow/BEAM:spacecraft/spacecraft3 IT'S GOOD
STATUS Orbiting Earth
RPOS 3554163.25 -1232259.88 5586380.78
RVEL -4611.803 4714.825 3962.852
AROT 49.95 36.83 138.83
VROT -0.06 -0.00 -0.00
ATTACHED 0:2,Tranquility
AFCMODE 7
NAVFREQ 0 0
RCS 1
CTRL_SURFACE 1
CONFIGURATION 1
CURRENT_PAYLOAD 0
SEQ 0 -2 0.000000
END
END_SHIPS
BEGIN_ExtMFD
END
Last edited:
pappy2
Active member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 43
hello "flow"
actually the problem comes from the command line below the script rectified everything OK thank you for your help
@ "Hutch" you should write in the "Add-on Docs" file with a short sentence an example scenario to insert
Great addon, it is much better and more complete than the previous version
good job !!
actually the problem comes from the command line below the script rectified everything OK thank you for your help
@ "Hutch" you should write in the "Add-on Docs" file with a short sentence an example scenario to insert
Great addon, it is much better and more complete than the previous version
good job !!
You're welcome Pappy - glad it fixed it for you.
I think most addon developers assume that users have a working knowledge of Orbiter - this is quite reasonable.
All the ones I've been in contact with are brilliant in offering their help if you're stuck and asking on the forum will always get you help.
Don has packaged this addon in a slightly different way using sub folders specifically named for the Bigelow BEAM - this for me is a brilliant way of keeping track of what you have installed.
Thanks again for this Don.
I think most addon developers assume that users have a working knowledge of Orbiter - this is quite reasonable.
All the ones I've been in contact with are brilliant in offering their help if you're stuck and asking on the forum will always get you help.
Don has packaged this addon in a slightly different way using sub folders specifically named for the Bigelow BEAM - this for me is a brilliant way of keeping track of what you have installed.
Thanks again for this Don.
Donamy
Addon Developer
It works better, when you have the BEAM docked with the Tranqulity. Then it docks by itself when let go by the SSRMS.
But then you have to have the tranquility docked to Unity and not attached. Orbiter law states, " thou shall't not dock to an attached vessel."
But then you have to have the tranquility docked to Unity and not attached. Orbiter law states, " thou shall't not dock to an attached vessel."
Last edited:
hutchison66
Donator
Yeah hate that law, could do so much if it was abolished that's why all my modules on my ISS are docked
Kyle
Armchair Astronaut
I wonder if that's something that we could suggest for a future version of Orbiter (to be able to dock to an attached vessel). Probably not as simple as I make it sound though.
Similar threads
