how would you describe e186

teamfresh

New member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Website
www.hd-fractals.com
I have rendered my latest deep zoom hunting for fossils.

The final magnification is e186
but how can I convey such a large number to my subscribers?
 
I don't think you can visualize such numbers at all. It is possibly bigger than the number of atoms in the universe.
 
The number of atoms in the Universe is estimated to be 10^80. So even if you exchanged every atom in the Universe for another Universe like ours, the total number of atoms in such a construction would still be about a billion billions billions times less than 10^186 ;)

(I hope my assumption that e186 meant 10^186 was right.)
 
Last edited:
Put it this way: If you took a proton, and magnified it by 1e186, the entire universe would be really, incredibly, negligibly small next to it. Tinier than anything you could possibly imagine.

That's the best I could come up with. You're really dealing with quantities most people are incapable of comprehending here. But comparisons like this are just a keyword, they can be just as meaningless if you can't imagine what a "proton" or "size of the universe" implies. I have a very poor grasp of any quantity beyond 1e|9| myself - that's the approximate border where numbers stop being intuitive quantities and turn into abstract concepts.
 
Past "proton magnified to the size of the universe", which I believe is e42, I have trouble thinking of anything to say as well.
Within that proton is a universe and within that, every proton is a universe, and within THAT, every proton is a universe. Even then I think that falls short of equaling e186!
 
Tell them it's 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, and even though they'll definitely not be able to visualize that, they would likely understand that it's impossible.

Edit: BTW, how long did that take to render?
 
Last edited:
Watch the video up to the nine minute mark and than pause it thereabouts, it is the most trippy, vertigo inducing thing I've done in a while.
 
Isn't e^186

2.718......^186, you know, as in.... e log thingamajig?

Yes, [math]e^x[/math] - but not 1E186, that is usually interpreted as [math]1 \cdot 10^{186}[/math] (More accurate would be [math]1 \cdot 2^{186}[/math], but that is a pretty unpopular convention, powers of ten would then be written as 1D186).
 
Last edited:
This is great! And a wonderful choice of hynotic music :)

What software did you use? I don't think Xaos can go this deep
 
quick question, but how do you know exactly to zoom in on to get interesting effects. it seems to me that the probability of hitting a blank area would rise to 1 upon increasing zoom factors unless you used an adapting target where it looks for edges near where it is currently targetting and slightly and continuously adjusts the focus.

am I right or is it some mathematical wizardry?
 
I'd describe it as;
one trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion billion.

Holy crap. That's huge. :blink:
 
Back
Top