originalpckelly
New member
I need someone to check my work, you'll see at the end that I'm not certain about some stuff.
I will use () to indicate a subscript for these purposes. I'm pretty sure I can't do a subscript, so sorry. I will also use 4D coordinates, as space/time are dimensions of the same thing, suggesting the ability to create a set of coords in all dimensions the same way. In addition to that Zeno's Paradox and the work of Peter Lynds* suggests instantaneous measurements cannot be made. Instead of the traditional variable T describing time, I will use W (when) for this purpose.
Let # be the coordinates of a system in W, X, Y, Z.
Let e(t) be the total energy in system #.
Let e(Δ) be the change in energy for system #.
Let e(0) be the constant amount of energy in system #.
e(t) = e(Δ) + e(0)
I submit that each denomination of money is equal to an amount of energy, as the economy is part of the universe, and all matter in the universe can be described in energy by e=mc^2, and all other things are already recognized as energy.
Therefore, all the goods/services in an economy may be described in terms of energy. As all goods services in the economy may be described by terms of money, money is somehow related to energy.
Let m(t) be the total amount of money in the economy, which is system # from before.
Let m(Δ) be the change in money for #.
Let m(0) be the the constant amount of money in #.
It would seem to be true that:
m(t) = m(Δ) + m(0)
Furthermore, I will suggest that the following relationship is true. I used a formula program to do this, so the things in () are actually subscripts:
When an economy has a net increase in energy, it should see a net increase in the money supply. When an economy has a net decrease in energy, it should see a net decrease in the money supply. If there is an increase in energy and not enough new money to represent it, then there is deflation. If there is an increase in money and not enough new energy, then there is inflation.
I hope I didn't screw anything up, also I'm a dork, so please be kind.
Reference for the possibly unfamiliar stuff:
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lynds
This is a general relationship (and it may not be true, as I assume I'm an idiot), but the units will be all messed up. I'm not sure, but I think this whole idea might require squaring or cubing or even hypercubing something (a hypercube is the 4D equivalent of a cube in 3d.)
^^^What do you far smart folks think?^^^
I will use () to indicate a subscript for these purposes. I'm pretty sure I can't do a subscript, so sorry. I will also use 4D coordinates, as space/time are dimensions of the same thing, suggesting the ability to create a set of coords in all dimensions the same way. In addition to that Zeno's Paradox and the work of Peter Lynds* suggests instantaneous measurements cannot be made. Instead of the traditional variable T describing time, I will use W (when) for this purpose.
Let # be the coordinates of a system in W, X, Y, Z.
Let e(t) be the total energy in system #.
Let e(Δ) be the change in energy for system #.
Let e(0) be the constant amount of energy in system #.
e(t) = e(Δ) + e(0)
I submit that each denomination of money is equal to an amount of energy, as the economy is part of the universe, and all matter in the universe can be described in energy by e=mc^2, and all other things are already recognized as energy.
Therefore, all the goods/services in an economy may be described in terms of energy. As all goods services in the economy may be described by terms of money, money is somehow related to energy.
Let m(t) be the total amount of money in the economy, which is system # from before.
Let m(Δ) be the change in money for #.
Let m(0) be the the constant amount of money in #.
It would seem to be true that:
m(t) = m(Δ) + m(0)
Furthermore, I will suggest that the following relationship is true. I used a formula program to do this, so the things in () are actually subscripts:
When an economy has a net increase in energy, it should see a net increase in the money supply. When an economy has a net decrease in energy, it should see a net decrease in the money supply. If there is an increase in energy and not enough new money to represent it, then there is deflation. If there is an increase in money and not enough new energy, then there is inflation.
I hope I didn't screw anything up, also I'm a dork, so please be kind.
Reference for the possibly unfamiliar stuff:
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lynds
This is a general relationship (and it may not be true, as I assume I'm an idiot), but the units will be all messed up. I'm not sure, but I think this whole idea might require squaring or cubing or even hypercubing something (a hypercube is the 4D equivalent of a cube in 3d.)
^^^What do you far smart folks think?^^^
Last edited:
