Question Is this document accurate?

[Enjo]

I've just sent explanations privately. I don't want to steer offtopic any more.

Ar81:

Now that I think of it, if you want to be better indexed by Google, it would be a wise idea to move the entire documentation to HTML and place somewhere on a blog or something, so that every word of it has some meaning to Google, not just the keywords.

My page is an example how you can do a TOC even in HTML:
http://www.elwico.pl/~ender-sz/mercenary/mddclone-sdl/
You can probably do much better though

 

[cjp]

Wait, you lost me. You're saying that ODF was pushed by Sun as a standard, even though there are already-standard (i.e. ISO approved) formats such as Microsoft's DOC format? Could you also clarify the reason you included that link?

Ouch, that is so incorrect that it hurts me. Will you please remove that from your post, to prevent further damage?

On second read, apparently you only suggest that this is someone else's statement. Anyway, it still hurts.

 

[MeDiCS]

Ouch, that is so incorrect that it hurts me. Will you please remove that from your post, to prevent further damage?

On second read, apparently you only suggest that this is someone else's statement. Anyway, it still hurts.

Yes, I was suggesting. Some misunderstandings led me to believe Enjo was saying that DOC was ISO-approved and ODF was pushed as a standard by Sun. Everything's been explained in private so as to not drift this thread too much off-topic.