- Joined
- Aug 5, 2008
- Messages
- 4,261
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
Last edited:
Maybe now that we have a new set of faces in the house of representatives, something will get approved to avoid the shutdown of the US manned space program for the foreseeable future. I too would hate to see the US manned space program outsourced to Russia or any other country.
Deficit Commission Errs, “Illustrative Cut” Would Outsource Human Spaceflight to Russia
By John Gedmark, November 10th 2010
Washington, D.C. – The Commercial Spaceflight Federation, representing 37 companies employing thousands of Americans nationwide, released a statement opposing in the strongest possible terms the “illustrative cut” to commercial spaceflight put forth today by the co-chairs of the Deficit Commission.
“This proposed cut would have disastrous consequences for NASA and the Nation. Commercial Crew now represents the primary means of transporting U.S. astronauts to orbit following retirement of the Space Shuttle. Commercial Crew will in fact result in substantial cost savings to the U.S. taxpayer. Eliminating Commercial Crew would result in total reliance on Russia to get to the Space Station and result in the loss of thousands of high-tech jobs here in the United States,” stated Bretton Alexander, President of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation.
Alexander added, “The bottom line is that elimination of NASA’s Commercial Crew program will cede human spaceflight to Russia. Commercial Crew is the fastest way to reduce the gap following Shuttle retirement, minimizing the time we are dependent on buying seats from the Russians. Some commercial providers have publicly committed to significant cost savings on a per-seat basis as compared to the Russian alternative.
“Moreover, the Deficit Commission also appears to misunderstand the very nature of the Commercial Crew Program. Rather than being ‘a subsidy to the private sector,’ the Commercial Crew program is fulfilling an essential national need by developing the next U.S. spacecraft to take astronauts to the Space Station, while stimulating markets beyond government as well. It is, in fact, a win-win for the American taxpayer.
“Last year, an independent blue-ribbon commission headed by Norm Augustine recommended to President Obama that NASA partner with the private sector on the development of its next manned spacecraft. Since then, groups including 25 former NASA astronauts and 14 Nobel laureates have all endorsed the Commercial Crew Program. The deficit commission couldn’t have gotten this more wrong – this is a program NASA cannot afford to do without,” Alexander concluded.
Commercial Spaceflight Subsidies To Be Cut
Jim Hillhouse, November 11th, 2010
Today, the Commercial Spaceflight Federation posted, Deficit Commission Errs, “Illustrative Cut” Would Outsource Human Spaceflight to Russia. The title, along with the premise, of this post is purely rhetorical. Because the Federation forgets that NASA is developing its own crewed transport system, the Bowles-Simpson proposed deficit reduction will not outsource human spaceflight to Russia, merely cut programs such as the authorized, but not yet appropriated, program within NASA to promote and pay for the development of commercial crewed spacecraft.
Today’s New York Times editorial, Some Fiscal Reality, supports the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan while noting the tough fiscal circumstances facing our nation. As the Times notes, a time of belt-tightening and tax-increases is coming in an effort to keep our nation’s debt from rising to over 90% of our country’s GNP. Demanding that government financial support by the billions for commercial crewed spacecraft development continue when so many agencies, NASA in particular, are facing cuts and so many people are facing either real benefits cuts or less-than-trivial tax increases, is politically tone deaf. Such an argument will fall on very deaf ears in the halls of Congress and within the White House.
Human space access is a national priority. Subsidizing commercial crewed spacecraft development is not. We have our national human space flight capability through NASA. The development of NASA’s Orion and Heavy Lift Launcher will assure that the U.S. will not only maintain its leadership in human space flight access, but in human space exploration as well. If commercial space companies wish to join NASA in orbit, perhaps they should find private investors willing to fund their dreams, just as Burt Rutan did in developing SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo. SpaceShipOne made it into space; so can the other commercial space companies.
A Senate hearing on the implementation of NASA's new policy, originally planned Thursday, has been delayed to Dec. 1.
An announcement by the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee didn't site a reason for rescheduling the hearing titled "Transition and Implementation: The NASA Authorization Act of 2010."
{...}
Unlike the NASA authorization act, however, the draft appropriations language does not call for an additional shuttle mission.
Orlando Sentinel: NASA budget funds third shuttle launch:
{...}
Draft legislation obtained by the Orlando Sentinel shows that NASA is set to get all but $90 million of the $19 billion proposed by President Barack Obama, more than enough to fund a third shuttle flight and ensure that about 4,000 Kennedy Space Center workers stay on the job likely into June when the orbiter fleet is scheduled to retire.
{...}