News Notre Dame de Paris on fire

about the renovation.
I hope they're going to use steel and glass.
You know....give it the "Reichstag treatment".
Not only to prevent making it to shoddy, but also to make sure it can last for at least another 800 years.
 
Yep, when looking at medieval stuff, it's amazing how often it got burnt/rebuilt. I guess this one is an exception, but usually, even castles got burnt/looted /whatever then rebuilt. If there are any marks/traces, they are witthin the original walls. That's pretty much the story with many medieval monuments (it dates from the 13th cetury, right?) : lots of stuff happened to it, but the original shell more or less remained, and they rebuilt
Edit: Saw it twice, and I never could have guessed the spire was wooden inside. I never understood why they built medieval buildings with a wooden roof. Why not make them entirely out of stone? Why fortify the walls like crazy, when the roof is the equivalent of the one on a big house? They had catapults, even then.
 
Last edited:
about the renovation.
I hope they're going to use steel and glass.
You know....give it the "Reichstag treatment".
Not only to prevent making it to shoddy, but also to make sure it can last for at least another 800 years.


Not sure if that makes sense for it.... I would prefer a roof structure like on the Cologne Cathedral (Iron and copper), which at least looks medieval despite not being it below the surface.



Also, I doubt the Reichstag cupola will last 100 years without significant repairs.... :lol:
 
about the renovation.
I hope they're going to use steel and glass.
You know....give it the "Reichstag treatment".
Not only to prevent making it to shoddy, but also to make sure it can last for at least another 800 years.

Though I would disagree!
The Reichstag has unique history in modern times, if at least for its political history. It was burned down before...

I'm totally ignorant of Notre Dame, but I'd like to se it restored to some point in its 800 years that would be representative. Though how you separate the architecture from the trade skills from its religious history?

Be interesting to watch.

N.
 
Yep, when looking at medieval stuff, it's amazing how often it got burnt/rebuilt. I guess this one is an exception, but usually, even castles got burnt/looted /whatever then rebuilt. If there are any marks/traces, they are witthin the original walls. That's pretty much the story with many medieval monuments (it dates from the 13th cetury, right?) : lots of stuff happened to it, but the original shell more or less remained, and they rebuilt


That is what really impressed me about the Cologne cathedral: Not just that it was build over multiple centuries with different available technologies, right below it are old roman structures still preserved after 2000 years.


CCAA-r%C3%B6mischer-Privathauskeller-2-3Jh-unter-dem-s%C3%BCd-westl-Domturm.JPG




Edit: Saw it twice, and I never could have guessed the spire was wooden inside. I never understood why they built medieval buildings with a wooden roof. Why not make them entirely out of stone? Why fortify the walls like crazy, when the roof is the equivalent of the one on a big house? They had catapults, even then.


Because of mass constraints. A too heavy roof would mean you need more wall structure to carry it - which means less windows. And it was all about the windows in essence.



Just compare this gothic cathedral:


Picardie_Beauvais2_tango7174.jpg




With that late romanic cathedral, which already had many design elements later used in gothic churches:


BacharachStPeter2009.jpg
 
Back
Top