Humor Random Comments Thread

I haven't had any sort of television subscription since moving out from my parents' place last year, and before then it had been years since watching it. The Internet has completely replaced that kind of programming for me with a number of websites, Youtube channels, etc.
 
Out of curiosity and cynicism, can anyone tell me of any good science shows still airing on U.S. television? History, Science, Discovery, Animal Planet, and Nat Geo have replaced almost everything with 'reality' shows and BS 'documentaries' appealing to the lowest common denominator (and probably the Military channel too judging by its rebranding). Is there anything left? Just PBS?
(At least Fox aired Cosmos!)

I don't think Science or History has done that quite yet. Being a regular watcher of Science, I haven't noticed any real change. They still have decent programs.

History, not too sure about that, but then again, I watch a derivative network, History 2. Nat Geo also has Nat Geo Wild, which has a healthy dose of "science shows", if you're into nature.

It also kind of depends on the science. Investigation Discovery is still mostly forensics, the plague of reality TV hasn't got to it yet (how would it?).

Smithsonian is also an option. There are only two shows I actually watch on that channel, and the majority of rest of their programs are documentaries, which are somewhat decent. No reality TV that I've noticed, but then again, I don't go on that channel a lot.
 
And there is no Nightwish without Tarya.... d'oh!

Ah, Nightwish, the band destroyed by its own marketing.

Nightwish didn't become known because it was a metal band with a female singer -- there's many of these -- it was a metal band with a female classical opera singer. That was new and unique.

It's sort of ironic that Nightwish has both catapulted Tarja to fame (and money...) and tarnished her reputation, as an opera singer associated with metal band is not going to be taken seriously by the opera-attending snobs. But she is indeed a good opera singer on her own, just listen to her rendition of Ave Maria:


The thing is however that the band was formed in 1997, and Tarja did not start attending opera school until 2000. To see what difference it made, listen to this original version of Sleeping Sun from 1998:


versus the 2006 version:


Yes, the original lyrics made no sense, but a competent singer would have been able to deliver these in an understandable way anyway.

However, four years of opera school later, Tarja was already a competent vocalist, and Nightwish rose to international prominence with the 2004 album Once. To see what the band was capable of at its peak, listen to this song:


But, as the old wisdom goes, the triumph contains the seeds of the fall. In this case, the fall was caused by the decision to promote the album not with its best song (Ghost Love Score), and not even customarily with track #1 (Dark Chest of Wonders). No, they chose track #3 - Nemo. But, the track itself was not the disaster. The disaster was the music video:


Now, it is sort of ironic for me to be writing this, because it's this very video which made me aware of the band... Anyway. If you watch the video, you will notice that the video shows mostly the singer or an actress which is very similar to the singer. In fact, you may think that it's the same person, just in different clothes, unless you watch carefully. The rest of the band is shown in passing, it's the support for the diva. Further, the video uses symbolic suicide / death imagery, which of course made it a roaring hit among emo teenagers worldwide, with teenage girls self-identifying with the diva. (Male teenagers bought it the moment they saw that the singer is reasonably attractive.)

Marketing-wise, this was genius. There was one problem, though. If you have made the singer the selling point and the face of the band then it is guaranteed to create tensions. Especially if the band is actually the brain child of the keyboard player -- who happens to be shown in the whole Nemo video maybe twice, for less than a second.

So the band leader, wanting to regain his own recognition, decides to fire the singer and find a new one. What he doesn't realize is that no professional opera singer will want to work with a metal band. (Remember that Tarja was not a pro opera singer when she joined the band -- she became one during her time with the band). He finally settles on a singer from an Abba tribute band. Then he goes back to composing, and in 2007 he comes up with Dark Passion Play album:


And you should immediately notice what the problem is. The composition is good. The execution is good. The new vocalist can sing. If you look at it the way a music critic does, the album is definitely on par with Once.

Except... the new singer has nowhere near the voice range and expression of Tarja.

The magic is gone.
 
Yeah, this summarizes the problem with Nightwish well. Much worse than the previous story: When Anette was finally getting good and the songwriting is not mistaking her for Tarya II on Imaginaerium.... she was fired.
 
Falcon 9-R blew up. SpaceX taking it in stride...

BvruXyYCEAASE8w.jpg
 
I don't understand how, even with zero education and slight mental instability, one could buy into that. Yet people all over seem to think this is happening, that crime is encouraged, and now the police get to deal with even more in a city already turned upside down.
I do not get humans...

I figured out what the real life purge crap is about. Apparently it gives teen girls and boys an excuse to hang out under the guise of collective protection. This is now a highly scary revelation.

Also I was planning to name my first song #purgenight but now that's being used by a bunch of loosers so I'm going to change it.
 
Anonymous comment below a glamour photoshot of Emily Ratajkowski:

In these clothes, with these cadres, in these poses, under this lighting, with this make-up and this photoshop -- even my dad would be an attractive lady.
 
Does it still count if you have replaced every single pixel with something else?

Because then it's definitely true.

Well, thats some extreme photoshopping... But then... if you replace every pixel by something else you get a new photo to photoshop... which means you are entering an recursion... :facepalm:

---------- Post added at 12:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:48 AM ----------

The dutch XC mountain biker Annefleur Kalvenhaar died yesterday after an accident during the qualifications for the world cup finals, the first death in the mountain bike world cup ever.
 
That's actually enough. With enough photoshop you can turn anything into something noteworthy.

Technically, yes... if someone is really, really good at it. But he'll spend days on it, all the while cursing the incompetent photographer.

Making a great photograph look extrordinary takes 15 minutes for an expierienced graphic designer.
Making a good photograph look great can easily take two hours.
Making an awful photograph look halfway decent takes hours upon hours of the most boring and annoying legwork imaginable.
 
About ten times the intensity than we had here recently. With the construction standards around here, probably 1/8 of the houses would have come down like they were made out of cards, had we experienced that one (I am estimating by the damage I have since seen in some of the other houses in the neighborhood).

Any members from the area? All okay?
 
I have an uncle in SF, but most of the more severe damage was in Napa, further inland and to the north. I actually visited Napa back in December...
 
Does it still count if you have replaced every single pixel with something else?

Because then it's definitely true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnvoz91k8hc

Seriously, 99.99% of the time it is used to adjust contrast/vibrance and color correct. To make a flat shot into a vivid, actual photograph. And that is true for landscape photos as well as astrophotography photos, and portraits photos as well.
You know you can also totally transform a person with makeup, right? And in fact that is very much used in photo shoots as well.
 
Back
Top