Please tell me there isn't a Jeb or a Bill on the nav teamAnd, as usual, the genius designers at Kerbal HQ have sent a ship 6 billion km before realising they forgot the landing gear...
Please tell me there isn't a Jeb or a Bill on the nav teamAnd, as usual, the genius designers at Kerbal HQ have sent a ship 6 billion km before realising they forgot the landing gear...
Wait, anchors may not have deployed...
Philae landed, but will it stay in place?
May take a while for really good pictures then. 32.77 kb/sec ~ 4.1 KB/sec, which is slower than dial-up.
Yes, only 4 cm damper compression which was even more gentle than expected. But latest news was that the anchors have not been deployed, they're now looking at wether or not to redeploy them.
But in earlier news from control room they did confirm that the harpoon has been fired. If the harpoon did work, what part do they mean by anchors? The drills on each tripod leg?
Nope, apparently it's from the mock-up on Earth.
Philae apparently bounced off the ground very slowly and lander may be starting to turn because the fly wheel has been turned off at touch down.
So, basically there is an unanchored, unstable lander on the comet that may or may not be bouncing along the surface. Oh, and they are going to be out of contact with it for several hours.
The man they interviewed said that he considers the mission a success no matter what because of the smiles of the mission team. Perhaps in the Nature article, they can just publish pictures of smiling flight controllers instead of data...
The weak gravitational pull and the apparent 2 hours between touchdowns makes me think that it couldn't have gone long places. maybe a few meters sideways, no more.Maybe they've luck and they have landed on a much more interesting area![]()