News Speed of light broken?

[jedidia]

As far as i understood, that's exactly what they did, and GPS was used for determining the distance between the sites.

Ah... The article made it sound like they sent a signal from the starting point that the package was underway and that it should start measuring... which would of course mean that the package would arrive there sooner than the signal even if not traveling FTL, so I must have misread something somewhere...

 

[Ghostrider]

A lot of people truly believe they can walk on water. Doesn't make it true.

Hey, I can walk on water. When frozen, of course.

 

[PennyBlack]

Ah... The article made it sound like they sent a signal from the starting point that the package was underway and that it should start measuring... which would of course mean that the package would arrive there sooner than the signal even if not traveling FTL, so I must have misread something somewhere...

I think they would have thought about that being they are more cleverer than us.

They need to redo the test, time and time again to prove the claim. But they may not bother considering the mass effect it would have, what with people fearing any contridiction to the laws of physics. It's just being anti-neutrino. :lol:

What if...

 

[Notebook]

Hey, I can walk on water. When frozen, of course.

Sorry, frozen water dosen't count, its called ice.

N.

 

[Ghostrider]

Sorry, frozen water dosen't count, its called ice.

That which we call water, by any other name would still soak you wet.

 

[Notebook]

Ok... I'll think of something soon...The Moon looks good tonight.

N.

 

[PennyBlack]

:woohoo:

Our full moon is next week... so I'm gunna be a while...

I know, I'll just count the trillions of neutrinos that'll pass through my body until then.

 

[Notebook]

Neutrinos, you have to love them, probably no choice!

N.

 

[orb]

 

[Unstung]

Speaking of SixySymbols, it's a pretty good channel on YouTube and has plenty more interesting scientific videos ranging from astronomy to quantum mechanics.

 

[PennyBlack]

I'm going to have to give the SixtySymbols channel a link in my favs.

---------- Post added at 08:19 ---------- Previous post was at 08:00 ----------

Remember Einstein’s static universe theory... anybody can be wrong, even a genious.

Question, question question, rinse then repeat.

 

[_Designer_]

Faster than light travel may be around the corner!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/us-science-light-idUSTRE78L4FH20110922

I saw this via stumble and I had to favor it!!!

What do you think, share your opinions...

 

[n72.75]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/us-science-light-idUSTRE78L4FH20110922

I saw this via stumble and I had to favor it!!!

What do you think, share your opinions...

Just because some neutrinos can make it to Italy and back faster than light can, doesn't mean that we're going to have warp-drives in ten years.

 

[DaveS]

Already discussed in this thread: http://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=24512

 

[_Designer_]

Already discussed in this thread: http://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=24512

I knew I should've clicked that search button first, lol.

If not 10 years, maybe 20 I don't mind I'll be alive to see it happen I hope

 

[jedidia]

 

[agentgonzo]

If not 10 years, maybe 20 I don't mind I'll be alive to see it happen I hope

Not in 100, not in 1000. Maybe in 10,000 years' time.

 

[Ghostrider]

Just because some neutrinos can make it to Italy and back faster than light can, doesn't mean that we're going to have warp-drives in ten years.

We should try it with Germany. Speed limits aren't enforced so tightly, I can understand neutrinos going to Italy might want to exercise a little caution.

 

[garyw]

Slow down guys. There is every chance that this is not a real breakthrough. there is ever chance that an error in the experiment gave the appearence of Muon Neutrinos going faster than light.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...uminal-muon-neutrinos-dont-get-your-hopes-up/

 

[PennyBlack]

Does anyone know when they are going to replicate the experiment again?