- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 1,683
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 38
and then we fall back to the true master of the camera lines, the lenses, the more I research upon this, the more I get the impression that Sony actually have excellent sensors, with mediocre lenses, while Nikon have just the opposite in the mirrorless category, and in fact, the best out there is the macro four third system used by Olympus and Panasonic, ah... just what I need, another field which have to have great deal of consideration and compromises, well I do still have another month or two to decide, let's just let all of this sink in for awhile and think.
These are the types of subtle difference I was talking about that crop up out of the histories of the company.
A little insight into my previous negative impression of the N1 in the store:
Basically I picked it up, oogled the pretty form and simplicity, focused around the store at max and min zoom, and snapped about 3 pictures. I wanted to see if I could clearly read the text on a distant sign. I opened ONLY the zoomed in pic and zoomed in on the sign as far as i could, it was blurry with what looked like compression artifacts. "eww" then I opened the menu and flipped through thinking that being a floor model, maybe it was on low quality setting, actualy it was on all the highest settings. disappointed, I set it down and felt better about my old camera, which though is only 6mp, litterally every pixel will be a clear and distinct color, giving photos that look sharper than casual-user 8 and 10mp photos. This was in fact one of the first things i noticed when i first got my dslr, every pixel is distinct information at the focus. This was especialy noticable and impressive when photographing things like grass and leaves or fine textures.