News The Royal Navy's new aircraft carrier has left its home port for the first time.

Notebook

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
11,965
Reaction score
765
Points
188
Easy, all yours for £3Billion, but aircraft not supplied...
 
Oooh, I like this. It's so pretty, shiny, and new. Where can I buy one?

You're an American. You already have like 10 of 'em, with nuclear reactors to boot, play with your own toys and leave the neighbor's kid alone.

On a related note: The official name of the F-35 is the "Lightning II", named for the Lockheed P-38 Lightning of WWII fame.

However, the UK also had a fighter called the Lightning, built of English Electric if memory serves.

So will the RAF and RN come up with their own name for the F-35 series, or just roll with the current name? When Spain bought Harriers (Harrier II actually) they renamed them "Matador" which I think is an awful name for such a cool jet, which has a very British name and whose design heritage is so obviously British-looking despite the US collaborated redesign.

---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------

Oops, looks like wiki answered my question: the name refers to both the P-38 and the EE Lightning:

On 7 July 2006, the U.S. Air Force, the lead service for the aircraft, officially announced the name of the F-35: Lightning II, in honor of Lockheed's World War II-era twin-propeller Lockheed P-38 Lightning for the United States Army Air Forces and the Cold War-era jet, the English Electric Lightning for the Royal Air Force.[34][N 2]


---------- Post added at 06:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:03 PM ----------

Also, that article states the ship's top speed as 25 knots. Surely it is faster than that?
 
It's ironic that conspicuously absent in this design are both British inventions that have come to define the modern carrier:
stream catapult and the angled flight deck.

So basically, the Royal Navy is making an all-in bet on the STOVL version of the F-35. Isn't that the version that's having the most problematic development? I seem to recall some years ago that version was in danger of being cancelled.
 
It's ironic that conspicuously absent in this design are both British inventions that have come to define the modern carrier:
stream catapult and the angled flight deck.

So basically, the Royal Navy is making an all-in bet on the STOVL version of the F-35. Isn't that the version that's having the most problematic development? I seem to recall some years ago that version was in danger of being cancelled.

I doubt that; that was about 7 years ago. The F-35B is currently in service with the USMC as of 2015.
 
The CATOBAR variant of the F-35 has the most issues at present, iirc. They're still chasing a serious issue with extreme bouncing on catstroke.
 
Back
Top