After thousands of years of pushing stuff into the water, we're still continuously thinking up and testing new designs and materials. :shrug:After 60 years of throwing stuff up there, we pretty much know how everything works.
After thousands of years of pushing stuff into the water, we're still continuously thinking up and testing new designs and materials. :shrug:After 60 years of throwing stuff up there, we pretty much know how everything works.
It means that they have found a propellant that is be reliable over an extended duration.
Is it just an impression or is the engine mounted off-axis? Didn't notice it before.
It is not off-axis, the aerodynamic fuselage is off-axis. :lol:
It is likely because usually solar arrays are deployed sideways, which cause the CoG to be shifted to the side in orbit configuration.
A single engine would be off axis, however the ship can accomodate two engines of this size, the second one, is not installed on both OVs, the second engine would accomodate a higer orbit, and was deemed not neccessary for these flights.
looks pretty nice after reentry - almost intact![]()
The thermal protection tiles are supposed to be tougher than the shuttle versions. I'd like to see how much maintenance has to be put into them on return.
Dave Mook should try 50+ sun lotion. :lol:
I'm still amazed by how well those TPS tiles are performing. By the time the X-37B touches down only the tiles on the nose are a bit warm. And even those are colder than the tires get on roll-out.
Hadn't heard that. Got a ref?
Bob Clark