Search results

What about Meshwizard? (I just found out about it minutes ago on another thread)

Actually this is different. It's not the Leonardo - the file is called mplm.cfg, and contains: ; === Configuration file for the International Space Station === Meshname = mplm Mass = 1.8e3 Size = 6.0 Inertia = 7.7 7.7 2.3 ; === Docking ports === BEGIN_DOCKLIST 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0...

Was there a Version 1 for V2006?

There is a mplm available with the standard Orbiter installation, but when docked to anything it looks like this: What I think is happening is that the docking port location in the cfg file does not match the port on the mesh? I was wondering if it would be possible to correct this, but...

About a week ago I remember reading (I think it was in Go Play In Space, but as I can't find it again I'm not sure) a line about addons that went something like "some addons may not work with Orbiter 2006, but can be updated with small changes to the files--okay if you really know what you're...

I've been using this continuous reality scenario for a couple of weeks, but ran into a problem. I was adding vessels by typing their information into the scenario file, but when it got upwards of 20 ships the frame rate plummeted and lots of orbits literally went ballistic (and some vertical)...

Just for help with comparison, here are pictures: The Module1: The Leonardo: and the mystery mplm, supposedly "docked" with the ISS:

Actually I don't think it is. The Dragonfly scenarios all contain one or two Module1's, a basic module, as well as a Module2, a node. This is from the scenario file: Module2A:Module2 STATUS Orbiting Earth RPOS -4067510.33 -4909620.86 2172373.43 RVEL -5966.746 4848.011 -211.174 AROT 39.17 -20.59...

On a related subject, also in the Config folder is a file called "mplm.cfg." It is different from the Leonardo_mplm file, and when inserted into a scenario it looks like an earlier model of Leonardo, complete with RMS grapple points. Yet it is not included in any of the Legacy Scenarios in the...

That's it--they were both set to high. With both on low, restarted the Current State and finally saw the exterior! And I finally understand the code brackets, too. I suppose that's just to reduce the amount of space it takes up in the post.... ---------- Post added at 11:07 PM ----------...

What tab is it under in the Launchpad? I can't find it. I already know that having multiple Orbiter installations does not effect Orbiter's performance--however the Orbiter base file overall is a large file and lots of files slow down computers! (I wonder if my PC has ports for extra RAM????)...

This is what it says in the scenario file: (Just for Atlantis and Carina) STS-101:Atlantis STATUS Orbiting Earth RPOS 4230523.84 963810.02 -5040773.75 RVEL 5623.591 1562.311 5090.305 AROT 96.69 -74.93 -5.17 PRPLEVEL 0:1.000 NAVFREQ 0 0 CONFIGURATION 3 GEAR 0 0.0000 ARM_STATUS...

This is the .log, but it looks fine to me, no obvious error messages.... **** Orbiter.log Build Sep 29 2006 [v.060929] Found 0 joystick(s) Module AtlantisConfig.dll [API v.060425] Module DGConfig.dll [API v.060425] Module undo.dll [API v.060425] **** Creating simulation session DirectDraw...

I've got a Textures folder and a Textures2 folder, and both contain an Atlantis folder full of .dds files. If it helps, Textures/Atlantis contains 17 items and Textures2/Atlantis has 8.

Looks like the pic didn't work--I'll try it again....

As soon as I opened a scenario containing Atlantis I noticed that it seemed to be missing a skin. I thought perhaps that was it for the default version, but all the pictures in the documentation (doc folder, anything relating to Atlantis), as well as in Go Play In Space, have the actual Shuttle...

Okay, here's the rest of the questions: (I searched all of them before posting) #2 Is there any particular reason there are no scenarios in the Launchpad for the Shuttle-PB? #3 #4 was a request for an addon, posted it in that area: http://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=16555...

I have several questions I intend to ask, so instead of starting a new thread for each one I will just post them here, and ask the next one as soon as the previous one is answered. It should be simpler that way, and besides the Forum won't be full of lots of questions from one person! :lol...

Posted this on another thread a few days ago.... With the new atmospheric model in O2010 this might be a good idea so you don't have to worry about it when you run a simulation lasting several months!

:idea: I think someone ought to make an addon that warns you when something is in danger of deorbiting..... :thumbup: