Advanced Question how to make spacecraft? An Astrobiology question?

[heraklitos]

I believe that life itself is present all over the universe. It is a matter of understanding it. The attribution of intelligence is a next step, like the one we do for ourselves.
I have reached an interesting methodology and process by which this understanding can greatly be enhanced. I am expecting criticism at first for the very possibility of what I am about to say and if the hat fits so to speak, how to go about it. So please be dismissive on scientific grounds, I believe I have something to disapprove here.

The space travelling craft- The space bending and far reaching exploration craft- The universe bending, interuniversal exploration craft

Now for the Scientific Minded
Purpose:
To find life specific traits of gravity and its regeneration to create attraction through non-draining but enhancing gravitational pull; to find a resonation that would not drain but actually enrich the attracted gravitational force.


Methodology:
- Looking for life specific traits of electrical activity and of sound within the Earth's electrical activity and sound activity
1)As location - the possibility margins of existence within the data of a point in time
2)As algorhytm - the location of existence within the data of a flow in time
- Basis of the assumption of the correlation of 1)electrical activity data 2)sound activity data 3)DNA sequence data for every species; The Approximation
X1 Y1 Z1 A1
X2 Y2 Z2 A2
X3 Y3 Z3 WHAT IS A3 ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION WE HAVE?
TAKE ANY 3 INDIVIDUAL TRAITS OF LIFE ABOUT A LIVING ORGANIZM AND CONTINIUE TO DO SO UNTIL THERE IS A COLLECTION OF DATA AND THERE IS AN EMERGED PATTERN. THEN TO APPROXIMATE A VALUE TO AN UNOBSERVED TRAIT OF A NEW LIVING ORGANIZM APPLY THIS PATTERN TO THE COLLECTION OF DATA. WHEN THE MISSING TRAIT IS OBSERVED IT WOULD GIVE YOU THE CHANGABLE STANDART DIVERSION. AS MORE DATA IS COLLECTED THE ESTIMATES OF THE APPROXIMATION WOULD BE MORE ACCURATE
- Statistical variability of the results;
The Changable Standard Deviation data acquired by correlating the Actual DNA with the Correlation DNA acquired by the approximation.


Process:
- The first test: take the electrical impulses and natural sounds and dna sequence of 1000 types of bacteria. When you test a different type for sound and electrical impulse, the correlation data of the 1000 types of bacteria would give you a dna sequence. Check for a possibility of changable standart deviation.
- The triple collection of data of as many species as possible.
- Recording for Earth's life specific sounds and electrical activity
- Locating the individual species in the recorded data by location and by algorythm
- The general life possible frequency isolation and its conversion by approximation to DNA sequence data
- Decoding and solving this DNA sequence data as a code of intelligent quality (like AI)
- Relationships of frequency and life and laws of energy attraction and production; hence the deduction of new laws.
- World of Love (What immediately moves on the Earth)
Life specific traits of gravity
Elementary specific traits of gravity
Machine specific traits(I guess anything bland will not do) of gravity
Water specific traits of gravity
Wind specific traits of gravity
The question of will;
Recreation of gravitational pull
vs
Individuality of resonation
What is the resonation of attraction?
Within the combined algorhytm of the 5 one could find a resonation
that would not drain but actually enrich the attracted gravitational force.
Movement through coordination of gravitational attraction to location.

A note to the admin; I hope I am allowed to open posts about general scientific questions. If not I am sorry to have bothered you.
:thumbup:

 

[Izack]

WHAT. :facepalm:

 

[T.Neo]

Could you elaborate? I'm afraid I don't fully understand your post. :uhh:

 

[fireballs619]

Cool story bro

Not too coherent though, but I think you have a good idea there, if you can convey it.

 

[MJR]

It seems more confusing than quantum physics. :blink:

 

[statickid]

Interesting... so what is step one and this sounds more like a way to search for life than to build a spacecraft. Also what does World of Love have to do with scientific questions...not criticizing here, just honestly asking if you can use more universal language. You'll have to define some of your terms or it just sounds like compound buzzwords.

 

[SiberianTiger]

I kinda loved the idea of recording natural sounds of 1000 types of bacteria...

 

[Pyromaniac605]

tl;dr

Sorry but really? Why the million (obvious exaggeration) line post?

Darren

PS: to the forums, just leave long posts to the Postmaster.

PPS: :hail:

 

[Hielor]

I feel like your proposal would best be backed by data.

I look forward to reading your summary once you have collected the natural sounds of 1000 bacteria and shown how that data corpus proves that gravity is, in fact, alive.

 

[Pyromaniac605]

proves that gravity is, in fact, alive.

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, that's what this guy is trying to prove?
:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
Beware the Facepalm army.

Darren

PS: TBH I think this guy's trolling, and trolling hard.

Edit: If this guy isn't trolling, I fear for his sanity...

 

[garyw]

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, that's what this guy is trying to prove?
:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
Beware the Facepalm army.

Well, I don't think we need to wait that much.

PS: TBH I think this guy's trolling, and trolling hard.

Edit: If this guy isn't trolling, I fear for his sanity...

Possibly but the OP has raised a discussion around what seems to be the suggestion of gravity as a lifeform but hasn't provided any proof or observations to support the idea so lets see if the OP can do that.
I find that many peoples suggestions tend to break down when the response is simply "show us the proof".

So, in response to the OP, this is your chance - show us the proof or at least show us some research rather than just a long winded and poorly posted rant at something that, with our current understanding of science, is not possible.

I look forward to reading your paper on the subject.

 

[Urwumpe]

I think the OP did not think about what he wants to measure and how he can measure it. The experimental setup is not only confusing, it is confused itself.

 

[n72.75]

lol wut?

I think this response is appropriated by the question.

I read it like six times and I still don't get it...

 

[Eccentrus]

hey look, it's his first post!

Okay, seriously, how could building any spacecraft have anything to do with astrobiology? even just from the title, I can already see what a technobabble (okay, more like sciobabble though) this truly is.

 

[fireballs619]

I actually managed to follow it up until the point where the matrix type thing (A1,B1,C1 etc) was introduced, and then any flirtation with coherency that existed was abrubtly lost. I wouldn't say that this guy is trolling (and if he is, it is the nerdiest topic for trolling I have seen), but the OP certainly has a strange idea, and way to test it. I'll take this seriously when there is actual data, not just a conjecture and a babble of technical words thrown together.

 

[Rtyh-12]

Ooook... I didn't understand a thing, but, if there's something that

proves that gravity is, in fact, alive.

then, as far as the entire universe is concerned, nothing changes. Gravity could be a giant invisible pink teapot, if it would still push stuff together, it would still be the same.

P.S.:No idea how a teapot could push stuff together.

 

[Wishbone]

A teapot is a great device for pushing people closer to each other.

 

[heraklitos]

We don't need any more data for a first test; we already do have a collection of sound, electrical activity and DNA sequence data that just needs to be gathered together. Why gather this data together and why do we need more data, particularly why every species on Earth? The answer to all these lies in symbiosis. Firstly, the symbiosis of life's frequencies (sound electric and DNA data might be mutually exclusive but when one considers that they are from the same organism, their relation and hence their correlation is inevitable), secondly the symbiosis of species; this is the hardest to understand since what lives very well together one place not only can't live in another place they can't be mixed with others from another place too. What is more they actually all live in the same place; Earth! Then we can even talk of symbiosis infinitely; of planets, of solar systems, of galaxies and even of universes.
The way ahead does demand the gathering of new data from the species and from Earth. We don't need a fancy microphone and one just has to record the sounds in the same type(same built perhaps) of instrument and the same goes for electrical data, there needs to be consistency of measurement for accuracy of cross referencing. We are looking through a microscope when we are looking at Earth for sound and electricity; the trick is we know what we are looking for and how to find it; a) as location; when we have the chourus of life as data we can look at the sound and electrical graphs of the Earth, taken at a point in time and locate the margins of such activity as Location, b)as algorithm; if we have a minutes of recording of millions of species each playing in a randomized loop that would give you the algorithm to see the flow of life in the Earth's data, hence Movement.

This is it for now, and thank you tea was great.

 

[Rtyh-12]

Well now I'm just confused...

 

[Hielor]

Meow.

Oh man, I just totally threw off all your data about what sounds different organisms make. Sorry.