News Japan Earthquake, Tsunami, & Nuclear Disaster

as amazing as the photos of the pump entering the aircraft is, this one is just heart-breaking:
article-1375120-0B8D10B100000578-797_634x445.jpg


---------- Post added at 03:03 ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 ----------

Just reminds me of the story: [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Match_Girl"]"The Little Match Girl"[/ame]
 
Yet another earthquake, this one is located under land instead of out to sea... revised from 7.1 down to 6.6... still bad news for the whole area. Godzilla is angry!

intensity.jpg
 
The evacuation zone has been extended, covering the village IAEA and NISA/MEXT were talking about a WEEK ago. Oh tempura, oh morons...
 
Based on the number of myopic decisions, Fukushima fits into its own category:
:goodnight: :goodnight: :goodnight: :goodnight: :goodnight: :goodnight: :goodnight:
a disaster de luxe
 
Troublesome news: Sr-90 found in the soil and plants outside the 30km zone. Leukemia, bone cancer, stomach cancer...
 
Troublesome news: Sr-90 found in the soil and plants outside the 30km zone. Leukemia, bone cancer, stomach cancer...

From Wiki: In the 1954 [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fiction"]science fiction[/ame] film [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godzilla"]Godzilla[/ame], a Japanese scientist claims that Strontium 90 is responsible for the resurrection of the pre-historic monster.
 
When the camera pans away, it's left up to your imagination if the person filmed happened to make it to a safe place uphill or not...

Yeah. I don't like the fact that they point the camera in the other direction at the moment of contact.
If you are trying to be respectful or something, then why film the whole thing at all?

If it was one of my family members that I was watching on a tsunami video like that I would want to know exactly what happened.
The fact that someone would take the time to record, instead of helping, then pan away at the end, would not please me.
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/14/us-putzmeister-idUSTRE73D1DZ20110414

Burial of Japan reactors trickier than Chernobyl: pump firm

AICHTAL, Germany | Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:32am EDT

AICHTAL, Germany (Reuters) - Encasing reactors at Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant in concrete would present much more of a challenge than Chernobyl, according to an executive of the firm whose pumps are helping cooling efforts there.

"In Chernobyl, where a single reactor was encased, 11 trucks were in action for a number of months. In Fukushima we're talking about four reactors," Gerald Karch, chief executive of the technical business of unlisted machinery maker Putzmeister, said in an interview with Reuters.

He said that while no decision had been made in Japan, concrete encasing would be the most sensible solution once the crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant has cooled down.

"In my opinion, when a closed-circuit cooling system has been developed and successfully set up, there will be no other option but to encase the reactors in concrete," he said.

He added, however, that the logistics of such an operation -- getting all the necessary trucks on site, for example -- would present a real challenge for plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO).

On Tuesday, Japanese authorities put the nuclear calamity on a par with the 1986 disaster in Chernobyl after new data showed that more radiation leaked from the power plant in the early days of the crisis than first thought.

"Yes, there are certain similarities between the two events, but at the same time I think that we can't really draw comparisons," Karch said.

"There is still a high chance that the situation (in Fukushima) can be stabilized," he said.

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster was the result of a single explosion, he said. That meant that in contrast to Japan the reactors did not have to be cooled and could be encased in concrete soon after the explosion.
 
http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-crescent-city-man-swept-to-sea,0,31470.story

Body of California Tsunami Victim Washes Up In Oregon
The man was swept out to sea while photographing the waves from the Japan tsunami.

KTLA News
6:07 p.m. PDT, April 12, 2011


CRESCENT CITY (KTLA) -- The body of a Northern California man swept out to sea by a surge from Japan's tsunami last month has washed up on the Oregon coast, some 300 miles away, authorities said on Tuesday.

The body of 25-year-old Dustin Douglas Weber, who was taking photographs of the tsunami when he was swept away, was found on April 2 by someone walking on the beach near Warrenton, Oregon, at the mouth of the Columbia River.

"The body had been in the water for several weeks," according to Dr. Christopher Young, Oregon deputy state medical examiner.

He said significant decomposition required identification using dental records and the official cause of death was listed as drowning.

"The only unusual thing about this is the distance, where the body was found. In a case like this, a body is usually found pretty close to where they entered the water," Young said.

Weber was swept out to sea on March 11, the day a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the coast of Japan and triggered a massive tsunami.

He was with two friends who also were carried off by the surge but were able to return safely to shore, authorities said.

Weber, who was born in Oregon and had moved to California only two weeks before the accident, had been taking photographs near the mouth of the Klamath River when he was swept away.
 
Information as of May 3 from IAEA (le plus ça change le plus c'est la même chose)
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html

On Tuesday, 3 May 2011, the IAEA provided the following information on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan:

1. Current Situation

Overall, the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant remains very serious.

Changes to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Status

The IAEA receives information from various official sources in Japan through the Japanese national competent authority, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA). The Update Brief is based on information received by the IAEA Incident and Emergency Centre by 17:00 UTC on 2 May 2011.

Management of On-site Contaminated Water

According to the 25 April evaluation by NISA of the report submitted by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), there is a little less than 70 000 tonnes of stagnant water with high-level radioactivity in the basement of the turbine buildings of Units 1, 2 and 3.

The stagnant water (around 120 m3) in the basement of the turbine building of Unit 6 was transferred to a temporary tank on 1 May. The transfer of stagnant water from the basement of the turbine building of Unit 6 was resumed on 2 May.

Work to block the Unit 2 trench pit was started on 1 May.

Plant Status

On 27 April TEPCO provided an update of the estimated percentage of core damage for Units 1, 2 and 3 following an assessment (the values assessed previously which TEPCO had provided on 15 March are given in parentheses): Unit 1: 55% core damage (70%); Unit 2: 35% core damage (30%); Unit 3: 30% core damage (25%). This reflects a revised assessment rather than any recent changes in conditions in the reactor cores.

White "smoke" continues to be emitted from Unit 2 and Unit 3. There was no more white "smoke" seen emanating from Unit 4 as of 21:30 UTC on 25 April or from Unit 1 as of 21:30 UTC on 30 April.

In Unit 1 fresh water is being continuously injected into the reactor pressure vessel through the feedwater line at an indicated flow rate of 6 m3/h using a temporary electric pump with off-site power.

In Unit 2 and Unit 3 fresh water is being continuously injected into the reactor pressure vessel through the fire extinguisher line at an indicated rate of 7 m3/h using temporary electric pumps with off-site power.

On 29 April TEPCO checked the status inside the reactor building of Unit 1 using a remotely controlled robot and confirmed that there was no significant leakage of water from the primary containment vessel. Nitrogen gas is still being injected into the containment vessel in Unit 1 to reduce the possibility of hydrogen combustion inside the containment vessel. The indicated pressure in the reactor pressure vessel is still increasing.

In Unit 1, the indicated temperature at the feedwater nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 142 °C and at the bottom of reactor pressure vessel is 106 °C.

In Unit 2 the indicated temperature at the feedwater nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 118 °C. The reactor pressure vessel and the dry well remain at atmospheric pressure. On 28 April an amount of 43 tonnes of fresh water was injected into the spent fuel pool using the spent fuel pool clean-up system.

In Unit 3 the indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the reactor pressure vessel is 99 °C and at the bottom of the reactor pressure vessel is 124 °C. The reactor pressure vessel and the dry well remain at atmospheric pressure.

On 2 May an amount of 55 tonnes of fresh water was injected into the Unit 2 spent fuel pool using the fuel pool clean-up system.

There has been no change in the status in Unit 5 or in the common spent fuel storage facility.

Spraying of anti-scattering agent at the site is continuing. An area of about 1 000 m2 on the south side of the turbine building of Unit 4, and an area of about 4 400 m2 of the surface on the slope around the former main office building, near the on-site gymnasium and on the west side of the shallow draft quay, were sprayed on 1 May.
...

Evidently the government thinks they can pull off the whole "fuggetaboutit" thing.
 
TEPCO workers entered the building of Unit 1, and found that corium is in the lower plenum. At Unit 3 a highly-active leak has been found. In other news: the Japanese government has provided TEPCO with a liquidity infusion, 62 bn USD at the going exchange rate. The condition attached is "do not pay dividends for 10 years". As if there were no methods to steal the money without paying dividends... WHERE ON CONTAMINATED EARTH IS THE FRILLING INQUIRY COMMISSION? With TMI afair there were three.
 

Breaking news
through Lenta.ru through AFP, attributed to Jiji Press: a worker at Fukushima 1 dies after collapsing at the workplace. TEPCO reps (short for "PR reptiles") are quoted as saying that there was no radiation contamination of the deceased.

EDIT: the deceased worker was over 60. Have heard somewhere that the Japanese respect the elderly people.

In other news: the shelter over Unit 1 is going to be made of plastic, and will be able to withstand (DRUMROLL) 25 m/s winds. Am not sure I agree with this design basis.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top