that was weird...
What? If it was my post appearing twice, that's because I thought I didn't post it, so I posted it again. It's corrected now.
that was weird...
Whenever Pilots finish thier missions, they have to report to thier respective division director, the division director can inforn me(deputy director) about the flight and how it was done, weather it was a success of failure, fuel spent, time taken...(blah blah blah)
I have to be honest.
I've looked at your website, and it seems largely unfinished to me, i.e. textures overlapping, some pages don't even work.
As someone pointed out you guys didn't have any goals posted until just recently, and I don't see any kind of membership/staff structure already worked out.
Yet you guys have not one, but two threads actively trying to recruit people on top of someone sending me a PM soliciting me to join your group.
Pretty aggressive when, I'm sorry to say, this looks largely unorganized and thrown together.
Not trying to put down what you're doing, just giving honest feedback from the perspective of someone that's been around the PR block a few times.
I have to be honest.
I've looked at your website, and it seems largely unfinished to me, i.e. textures overlapping, some pages don't even work.
As someone pointed out you guys didn't have any goals posted until just recently, and I don't see any kind of membership/staff structure already worked out.
Yet you guys have not one, but two threads actively trying to recruit people on top of someone sending me a PM soliciting me to join your group.
Pretty aggressive when, I'm sorry to say, this looks largely unorganized and thrown together.
Not trying to put down what you're doing, just giving honest feedback from the perspective of someone that's been around the PR block a few times.
Coming from my experience with trying to start a VSA, I cannot stress enough having a good management structure. Right now, it seems to me that all of the current positions could easily be done by one competent manager. Why split up the tasks when they can be accomplished by one individual. One of the main flaws that almost every VSA makes is that they over distribute positions. You want to direct satellites? Great, you're the Satellite Director. You want to train new pilots? Great, you're the director of admissions. I'm not saying that the positions you guys have will not be needed in the future, but, from the looks of it many are not currently essential. Why have a director of manned spaceflight when you have yet to schedule the first mission? I suggest a reorganization of management if you want an efficient system.
Also, if you are so inclined, you can dig back through my blogs to see my updates on a VSA i was doing, and possibly to avoid the pitfalls that I made.
Coming from my experience with trying to start a VSA, I cannot stress enough having a good management structure. Right now, it seems to me that all of the current positions could easily be done by one competent manager. Why split up the tasks when they can be accomplished by one individual. One of the main flaws that almost every VSA makes is that they over distribute positions. You want to direct satellites? Great, you're the Satellite Director. You want to train new pilots? Great, you're the director of admissions. I'm not saying that the positions you guys have will not be needed in the future, but, from the looks of it many are not currently essential. Why have a director of manned spaceflight when you have yet to schedule the first mission? I suggest a reorganization of management if you want an efficient system.
Also, if you are so inclined, you can dig back through my blogs to see my updates on a VSA i was doing, and possibly to avoid the pitfalls that I made.
We are not going to go into that much detail, Right now there are only 3 of us(and i think it could be better with few of us, i agree with you on that matter)
and thanks, im going through the blogs now
im not sure about unmanned mission directors only, what is the actual difference between manned and unmanned in a space flight simulator? always someone will be controlling it and with 2 directors for differecnt types of flight, it will get to fragmented(thanks fireballs619 for the notice!), so i think we should drop that, Mission control post can remain open still.
yea thats what i meantAnd I think you're wrong. If at least just merge it together for the department of "spaceflight'