- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 38,965
- Reaction score
- 3,937
- Points
- 203
- Location
- Wolfsburg
- Preferred Pronouns
- Sire
A little back on topic: what about the reentry of the 1st stage? Any news?
Dead and gone - no reuse testing on this flight.
A little back on topic: what about the reentry of the 1st stage? Any news?
It would ruin the point of it. SpaceX is supposed to be a private and commercial company.
It would ruin the point of it. SpaceX is supposed to be a private and commercial company. There isn't going to be commercial needs for BEO/interplanetary for a looong time... Or maybe if the Chinese build a moonbace in 2020 and ask SpaceX to supply them... I have my doubts... :hmm:
The best SpaceX can do (and it was why it was funded at the beginning) is to relieve NASA of the LEO operational costs (ISS or other future stations), letting the national agency focus on science and exploration of space, which was its first goal, (and that is still actively carried through unmanned probes).
Anyone know what this weird parallel plume is? It obviously didn't interfere with the launch but it followed the rocket up a ways.
For Orbiter?
Bob Clark
That's certainly a good record to add to SpaceX's resume, versus the other commercial companies. If we can get Thaicom-6 off in the next few weeks, SpaceX may be about to hit the ground running with the schedule.
I'd love for one day for a Falcon 9 to have a BEO/interplanetary mission with NASA.
SpaceX is supposed to be Elon Musk's ticket to Mars.
Not NASA, but some Google X-prize entrants plan to use the Falcon 9 for launch of their lunar rovers.
*coughs* don't start me on this... :uhh:
The exhaust flame image on a lens protector. I had a similar effect when I took photos of a shuttle launch with a lens protector attached to my lens. I never did that again.