I'd prefer tightly packed beautiful girls![]()
Remember, in the EU and since 2012, chicks require at least 750 cm² ground surface when held indoors.![]()
Small update: - more tommorow
![]()
I was wondering are both the pilots female or are there one male one female like In the XR2?
Keatah said:Hot! How am I supposed to fly the craft with this sort of distraction going on?
Added 1 more window on each side. Looks better IMO
Could I make a few minor aesthetic/cosmetic suggestions? But since I don't have files I could just draw the outline with MS Paint. They're minor anyways.

View attachment 11284
These are minor aesthetic updates which add balance and completeness.
1- The rounded wingtip is the best IMHO, because it eliminates the chopped-off look and adds a sense of balance.
2- Body flap - this could be a practical control surface. I think it completes the back end nicely. And pays a little heritage to the shuttle. It could be retractable or fixed.
3- If you don't want to round off the wingtips, what about using them as hardpoints. Hardpoints for hooking up multi-mission pods of a sort, but that would eliminate the rounded wingtip, which I think is much better.
4- Rounded back end. Just a little more cylindrical. This gets rid of the stapled and stamped "flattened pipe" look. Or maybe just adding the body flap works well here. Yes. We need a lot of control authority back there! Just the flap alone would work functionally and aesthetically.
5- Maybe round off the area just aft of the cockpit? This provides top and bottom visual balance more than anything. It serves little practical purpose other than to increase tooling and fabrication costs.
Progress update:
cockpit windows are in place, scram engines are now inside fuselage, and I have cut out and aligned holes for front hover engines.
...
It's one sleek looking ship! We went to the aquarium yesterday, the side view of the XR3 reminds me of some dolphin species' profile... is that on purpose?
:tiphat: