Updates LRO/LCROSS News and Updates

But you can beat it. A lot.

Yeah, just ask Aldrin. :lol:

I wonder what happened to those who said that they wouldn't believe it wasn't a hoax until they saw pictures of the flag on the moon?

Oh well, mustn't let facts get in the way ... do they?
 
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG WATER ON THE MOON!!!!!!

Jeez, people... what did you expect?

Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe. Second most common is Helium, but that doesn't form any molecules under normal conditions. The third is Oxygen... so it's kind of not surprising that you'll find water everywhere...


Now, if you find Ozone, that'll be an exciting day.
 
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG WATER ON THE MOON!!!!!!

Jeez, people... what did you expect?

Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe. Second most common is Helium,

I disagree. The second most common element is stupidity. Recent events :probe:will confirm this.
 
LRO finds Soviet landers Luna 20, 23, and 24 and also tracks of Lunokhod 2

A picture from the material linked on suggests that Lunokhod drivers really had some fun driving it around:

2010-03-16_203848_Lunokhod2.gif
 
Actually, they mistaken is finding the Lunokhod 2 on the pictures. The second attempt produced this:

M109039075LC_pyr_basilevsky_lg.jpg


Black arrow points to what they originally thought was the rover, while the white arrow points at the real rover. The darker spot might be the pit Lunokhod 2 inadvertently excavated with its solar cell 'plate' when driving out of the nearby crater.

Now Dick Garriott can at least see that his property is really there.

---------- Post added at 12:53 ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 ----------

BTW, Lunokhod 1 is there as well!

4b0f16cdd7bd.jpg


Situational and ground tracks map:

lunokhod1_l_17_with_map_50pct_lg.jpg
 
Last edited:
I disagree. The second most common element is stupidity. Recent events :probe:will confirm this.

I disagree there to, the most common element is stupidity :thumbup:

Actually, they mistaken is finding the Lunokhod 2 on the pictures. The second attempt produced this:

Black arrow points to what they originally thought was the rover, while the white arrow points at the real rover. The darker spot might be the pit Lunokhod 2 inadvertently excavated with its solar cell 'plate' when driving out of the nearby crater.

Wow :speakcool: Wish it was possible to see those kinds of details from Earth.
 
LRO's Narrow Angle Camera has found a new crater on the Moon! This impact crater is not visible in images taken during Apollo 15, so it must have formed sometime in the last 38 years. The new crater is ~10 meters (30 feet) across.

M108971316L_thumba.serendipityThumb.png


Full story: New Impact Crater on the Moon!
 
LRO discovers that Moon is shrinking

Newly discovered cliffs in the lunar crust indicate the moon shrank globally in the geologically recent past and might still be shrinking today, according to a team analyzing new images from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft. The results provide important clues to the moon's recent geologic and tectonic evolution.
...



The moon may be shrinking.

That's the word from scientists analyzing data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, a NASA probe returning tantalizing pictures of young faults on the moon.
...



Evidence that the Moon is shrinking has been found by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which has discovered thrust faults all over the Moon where the surface has crumpled upwards as the Moon has contracted.
...
 
LROC finds natural bridges on Moon.

One of the bridges is approximately 7 meters wide on top and perhaps 9 meters on the bottom side, and is a 20 meter walk for an astronaut to cross from one side to the other.

657.png

Another amazing bit of lunar geology revealed by LROC! NAC M113168034R, north is up [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Just when you think you have seen everything, LROC reveals a natural bridge on the Moon! Who would have thought? Natural bridges on the Earth are typically the result of wind and water erosion – not a likely scenario on the Moon. So how did this natural bridge form? The most likely answer is dual collapse into a lava tube. From the Apollo era, SELENE, and LROC images, we know that lava tubes did form in the Moon’s ancient past. SELENE and LROC images have raised the tantalizing prospects that lava tubes remain intact to this day. However this bridge did not form in mare (basalt), but rather in impact melt from King crater! More astonishingly, the same NAC image revealed two natural bridges – not just one!

658.png

The bridge is approximately 7 meters wide on top and perhaps 9 meters on the bottom side, and is a 20 meter walk for an astronaut to cross from one side to the other [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

How do we know for sure that this feature is truly a bridge? Look closely at the west pit (left side) and you can see a little crescent of light on its floor. That patch of light came from the east, under the bridge. In another lower resolution image (see inset), you can see light passed under the bridge from the west. So there must be a passage. How did this oddity form? The impact melt deposit on the north rim of King crater is over 15 km across and was emplaced in a matter of minutes as the crater grew to its final configuration.

659.png

A large (17 km east to west), smooth impact melt “pond” on the northwest rim of King crater (72 km diameter). LROC WAC mosaic [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The impact melt that was thrown out of the crater pooled on the newly deposited ejecta and must be many tens of meters thick, allowing its interior to stay molten for a long time. As the local terrain readjusted after the shock of the impact, the substrate of this massive pool of melt was jostled to some degree. Local pressures built up and the melt moved around under a deforming crust. You can see that the south end of the bridge extends from a small local rise, shaped something like a blister. Perhaps some melt was locally pushed up forming the rise, then the magma found a path to flow away, leaving a void which the crusted roof partially collapsed? Right now we do not know for certain the details of how the bridge formed, however, the LROC team is processing stereo images into topographic maps to aid scientists in determining exactly what took place on this fascinating melt sheet. There are actually six NAC images in which you can find the bridge under varying lighting (M103725084L, M103732241L, M106088433L, M113168034R, M123785162L, M123791947L). Why so many images? The melt sheet north of King crater is one of the Constellation regions of interest – a high priority for LROC coverage. As the pair of images below vividly illustrate, having a set of images of the same under varying lighting allows scientists to more confidently interpret the local geology and thus better prepare for future exploration.

660.png

Left shows the bridge when the Sun is 42° above the horizon and the right is the same area when the Sun is 80° above the horizon (near noon). M113168034R on the left, M123791947L on the right, both are 128 meters across, north is up [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Explore the entire LROC NAC image and investigate the variety of geologic features in the King crater melt sheet. Can you find the second natural bridge in the full NAC frame (hint – it’s fairly close to the one shown above and about half its size)?
 
LROC captures high Sun view of Mare Tranquillitatis pit crater.

When the Sun is well overhead, the floor of the Mare Tranquillitatis pit is illuminated, revealing boulders on an otherwise smooth floor.

667.png

Spectacular high Sun view of the Mare Tranquillitatis pit crater revealing boulders on an otherwise smooth floor. Image is 400 meters wide, north is up, NAC M126710873R [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

When the Sun is well overhead, the floor of the Mare Tranquillitatis pit is illuminated. With an incidence angle of 26.5° and a shadow of 55 meters, scientists can estimate the depth to be a bit over 100 meters. That estimate is from the edge of the shadow, which begins a slightly downslope from the gradual margin of the pits. When measured from the level of the surrounding mare plain, the depth of the pit is even greater. Compare this depth to the width, which ranges from 105 to 115 meters across the sharp precipice.

669.png

Two views of Mare Ingenii pit [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

A pair of Mare Ingenii pit images (each panel is 150 meters wide) reveals different portions of the floor as the Sun crosses from West to East (Left M123485893RE, Right M128202846LE). Shadow measurements indicate that the Ingenii pit is about 70 meters deep and its width is about 120 meters. The Sun angle, direction, and elevation perfectly illuminate the layered nature of the mare basalts. Each shelf corresponds to a local lava flow event. By climbing down this “staircase” a geologist astronaut can sample increasingly further back in time.

671.png

Variations in lighting reveal the structure of the fascinating lunar pit craters. The center panel, with the Sun high above, gives scientists a great view of the Maurius Hills pit floor. Each panel is 300 meters wide, left M133207316LE, center M122584310LE, right M114328462RE [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

LROC has now imaged the Marius Hills pit three times, each time with very different lighting. The center view has an incidence angle of 25° that illuminates about three-quarters of the floor. The Marius pit is about 34 meters deep and 65 by 90 meters wide. Do any of these pits provide access to still-open/uncollapsed lava tubes? What could be learned by visiting and exploring one or all of these fascinating features? Imagine entering a preserved lava tube, unchanged for more than 3 billion years; such an opportunity is a geologist’s paradise – a chance to travel back in time to see what brand-new lava flows look like! What types of rare minerals might exist on these hidden surfaces (if they exist)? Do you think we should send a robot into one of the pits? How about astronauts; is it worth sending humans in to explore? How would you like to explore this amazing feature?

---------- Post added 15th Sep 2010 at 10:11 PM ---------- Previous post was 14th Sep 2010 at 10:17 PM ----------

NASA's Lunar Spacecraft Completes Exploration Mission Phase.

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, will complete the exploration phase of its mission on Sept. 16, after a number of successes that transformed our understanding of Earth's nearest neighbor.

LRO completed a one-year exploration mission in a polar orbit approximately 31 miles above the moon's surface. It produced a comprehensive map of the lunar surface in unprecedented detail; searched for resources and safe landing sites for potential future missions to the moon; and measured lunar temperatures and radiation levels.

The mission is turning its attention from exploration objectives to scientific research, as program management moves from NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate to the Science Mission Directorate at the agency's Headquarters in Washington.

"LRO has been an outstanding success. The spacecraft has performed brilliantly," said Doug Cooke, associate administrator of the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate. "LRO's science and engineering teams achieved all of the mission's objectives, and the incredible data LRO gathered will provide discoveries about the moon for years to come."

The LRO team will continue to send data gathered during the last year to the Planetary Data System, which archives and distributes scientific information from NASA planetary missions, astronomical observations and laboratory measurements.

By the time LRO achieves full mission success in March, and its data is processed and released to the scientific community, it will have sent more information to the Planetary Data System than all other previous planetary missions combined. During its new phase of discovery, LRO will continue to map the moon for two to four more years.

"The official start of LRO's science phase should write a new and intriguing chapter in lunar research," said Ed Weiler, associate administrator for the Science Mission Directorate. "This mission is one more asset added to NASA's vast science portfolio."

The spacecraft launched from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida carrying a suite of seven instruments on June 18, 2009. LRO formally began its detailed survey of the moon in September 2009.

Results from the mission include: new observations of the Apollo landing sites; indications that permanently shadowed and nearby regions may harbor water and hydrogen; observations that large areas in the permanently shadowed regions are colder than Pluto; detailed information about lunar terrain; and the first evidence of a globally distributed population of thrust faults that indicates the moon has recently contracted and may still be shrinking.

LRO also took high resolution pictures of the Lunokhod 1 rover that had been lost for almost 40 years. The rover, which carries a retroreflector, was located to within approximately 150 feet. The accurate position data enabled researchers on Earth to bounce laser signals off the retroreflector for the first time ever. The retroreflector is providing important new information about the position and motion of the moon.

LRO also supported the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite impact, a companion mission sent to determine if the moon's poles harbor water ice, by helping to select a promising impact site. LRO observed both the expanding plume that arose after the impact and the evolving temperature at the site.

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., built and manages LRO for the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate. The Institute for Space Research in Moscow provides the neutron detector aboard the spacecraft. For more information about LRO, visit: www.nasa.gov/lro.

---------- Post added at 10:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:11 PM ----------

NASA to Hold Media Briefing Featuring More Interesting Results from Lunar Mission.

NASA will host a media teleconference at 2 PM EDT on Thursday, September 16 to discuss compelling new research results from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission.

Panelists include:

- Michael Wargo, chief lunar scientist, exploration systems mission directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington.
- James Head, professor of geological sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI.
- Benjamin Greenhagen, scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
- Timothy Glotch, assistant professor of geosciences, Stony Brook University, NY.
- Richard Vondrak, LRO project scientist, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
 
NASA:
Science:
  • Moon Hit With a Double Whammy of Impacts:
    The moon may be only 384,000 kilometers away, but that doesn't mean it isn't full of mystery. Scientists studying the first year's worth of data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) have found unexpected mineral deposits, the possibility that our natural satellite was bombarded in two waves in its early history, and virtually no trace of a pristine lunar surface. If scientists can confirm these findings, they could take big steps toward understanding not only the moon's distant past but also Earth's and the rest of the solar system's as well.
    ...

ScienceNews:
Scientific American:
ABC Science:
  • Moon's surface at saturation point:
    A new study has found parts of the lunar surface are now so badly pot marked with impact craters, each new impact destroys existing craters.

    The finding, based on research carried out by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft is providing a better understanding of the early history of both the Moon and the Earth.
    ...


---------- Post added at 16:40 ---------- Previous post was at 13:26 ----------

And one more - Astronomy Now: LRO exposes Moon's complex youth.
 
JPL: "NASA's LRO Exposes Moon's Complex, Turbulent Youth".

pia13391-640.jpg

Map showing global compositional variations measured by the Diviner lunar radiometer aboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Image credit: NASA/GSFC/UCLA/JPL.
› Full image and caption.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA13391

The moon's surface is more complex than previously thought and was bombarded by two distinct populations of asteroids or comets in its youth, according to three new papers in the Sept. 17 issue of Science that describe data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Two of the papers describe data from LRO's Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment instrument that reveal the complex geologic processes that forged the lunar surface. The data showed previously unseen compositional differences in the crustal highlands, and confirmed the presence of anomalously silica-rich material in five distinct regions.

All minerals and rocks absorb and emit energy with unique signatures that reveal their identity and formation mechanisms. For the first time, the Diviner instrument is providing scientists with global, high-resolution infrared maps of the moon, enabling them to make a definitive identification of silicate minerals commonly found within its crust. "Diviner is literally viewing the moon in a whole new light," said Benjamin Greenhagen of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., lead author of one of the Diviner papers.

Lunar geology can be roughly broken down into two categories – the anorthositic highlands, rich in calcium and aluminium, and the basaltic "maria," giant impact basins filled with solidified lava flows that are abundant in iron and magnesium. Both of these crustal rocks are considered the direct result of crystallization from lunar mantle material, the partially molten layer beneath the crust.

Diviner's observations have confirmed that most lunar terrains have signatures consistent with compositions in these two broad categories. But they have also revealed lunar soil compositions with more sodium than that of typical anorthosite crust. The widespread nature of these soils reveals that there may have been variations in the chemistry and cooling rate of the magma ocean that formed the early lunar crust, or they could be the result of secondary processing of the early lunar crust.

Most impressively, in several locations around the moon, Diviner has detected highly silicic minerals such as quartz, potassium-rich and sodium-rich feldspar -- minerals that are only associated with highly evolved lithologies, or rocks that have undergone extensive magmatic processing. Detection of silicic minerals at these locations is significant, as they occur in areas previously shown to exhibit anomalously high abundances of the element thorium, another proxy for highly evolved lithologies.

"The silicic features we've found on the moon are fundamentally different from the more typical basaltic mare and anorthositic highlands," said Timothy Glotch of Stony Brook University, N.Y., lead author of the second Diviner paper. "The fact that we see this composition in multiple geologic settings suggests that there may have been multiple processes producing these rocks."

One thing not apparent in the data is evidence for pristine lunar mantle material, which previous studies have suggested may be exposed at some places on the lunar surface. Even in the South Pole Aitken basin, also known as SPA, the largest, oldest, and deepest impact crater on the moon -- deep enough to have penetrated through the crust and into the mantle -- there is no evidence of mantle material.

The implications of this are as yet unknown. Perhaps there are no such exposures of mantle material, or maybe they occur in areas too small for Diviner to detect. But it's likely that if the impact that formed this crater did excavate any mantle material, it has since been mixed with crustal material from later impacts inside and outside the basin.

"The new Diviner data will help in selecting the appropriate landing sites for potential future robotic missions to return samples from SPA," Greenhagen said. "We want to use these samples to date the SPA-forming impact and potentially study the lunar mantle, so it's important to use Diviner data to identify areas with minimal mixing."

In the other paper, lead author James Head of Brown University in Providence, R.I., describes an analysis of a detailed global topographic map of the moon created using LRO's Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter. This new dataset shows that the older highland impactor population can be clearly distinguished from the younger population in the lunar maria. The highlands have a greater density of large craters, implying that the earlier population of impactors had a proportionally greater number of large fragments than the population characterizing later lunar history, Head said.

Head said details about impactor populations on the moon have implications for the earliest history of all the planets in the inner solar system, including Earth. "Like the Rosetta stone, the lunar record can be used to translate the 'hieroglyphics' of the poorly preserved impact record on Earth," he said.

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., built and manages the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, a NASA mission with international participation from the Institute for Space Research in Moscow. JPL designed, built and operates the Diviner instrument. The University of California, Los Angeles is the home institution of Diviner's principal investigator, David Paige. LOLA was built by Goddard.

A more detailed release on the LRO results is available at www.nasa.gov/lro. More information is also available on the Diviner website at http://diviner.ucla.edu.

---------- Post added at 11:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 PM ----------

SPACE.com: "Moon's Face Reveals Extreme Cosmic Abuse".

Discovery News: "Moon's Scars Reveal Troubled Childhood".

New Scientist: "Crater map rekindles debate over moon impacts".

---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 PM ----------

Global Distribution of Large Lunar Craters: Implications for Resurfacing and Impactor Populations.

By using high-resolution altimetric measurements of the Moon, we produced a catalog of all impact craters ≥20 kilometers in diameter on the lunar surface and analyzed their distribution and population characteristics. The most-densely cratered portion of the highlands reached a state of saturation equilibrium. Large impact events, such as Orientale Basin, locally modified the prebasin crater population to ~2 basin radii from the basin center. Basins such as Imbrium, Orientale, and Nectaris, which are important stratigraphic markers in lunar history, are temporally distinguishable on the basis of crater statistics. The characteristics of pre- and postmare crater populations support the hypothesis that there were two populations of impactors in early solar system history and that the transition occurred near the time of the Orientale Basin event.

The record of impact craters on the surface of the Moon, particularly the size-frequency distribution (SFD) and spatial density of craters, has long been used to infer information about the age of surfaces and the sequence of geological events (1). Unfortunately, uneven areal coverage, different image resolutions, and a wide range of solar illumination geometries from previous spacecraft mission data have precluded the compilation of a consistent global data set of the impact crater population. In the past year, the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) (2), an instrument on board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft, has acquired globally distributed, high-precision measurements of the topography of the Moon, which enable the creation of a 64-pixels-per-degree digital terrain model (DTM) and a shaded relief model of the surface (3). These data provide a view of the global distribution of impact craters without the observational uncertainties that arose from measurement of craters on images of heterogeneous illumination condition and uneven coverage and quality. We used this data set to produce a global compilation of the distribution of impact craters ≥20 km in diameter.

We mapped craters on the Moon by overlaying a 20-km reference grid on the topography and hillshade and by systematically measuring across the lunar surface (4) with the CraterTools extension to ArcMap (5) to make diameter measurements of craters. All craters with a measureable rim and central depression were cataloged, regardless of their degradation states or whether they were embayed or buried by younger surface units; identified craters were also examined in an underlying ArcMap layer containing the best available images. In total, we mapped 5185 craters with diameters ≥ 20 km on the lunar surface, a factor of ~2 increase in the number of craters of this size from Wilhelms et al. (6), whose analysis examined 82% of the lunar surface.

By using the craters mapped in our data set (Fig. 1A), we determined the areal density of craters on the Moon by calculating the number of craters in a moving neighborhood of 500 km in radius (Fig. 1B). The scale of this moving neighborhood sets the minimum area that is effectively sampled, ~8 × 105 km2. The resulting crater densities reflect first-order variations in the crater retention age (for 20-km craters and larger) across the surface. We report densities here as N(20) values, which represent the number of craters per unit area with diameter ≥ 20 km, normalized to 106 km2. The most prominent features in Fig. 1B are (i) the densely cratered highlands, particularly on the southern nearside and north-central far-side of the Moon, (ii) the interior and surroundings of stratigraphically young impact basins, especially Orientale, and (iii) mare regions, which have the lowest crater densities on the Moon.

679.jpg

Fig. 1. (A) An outline of the craters mapped on the surface of the Moon from LOLA data superposed on a hillshade rendering of LOLA topography (2, 3). (B) Crater densities on the Moon for craters ≥20 km in diameter, calculated in neighborhoods of radius 500 km. (C and D) Central far-side highlands (centered at –7°N, 130°E), one of the most densely cratered areas of the Moon. © Craters superposed on a LOLA hillshade base map. (D) Slope map of area in © showing the lack of smooth intercrater plains such as those found on Mercury (11).

Impact crater SFD analyses for units in the maria have been used successfully to develop stratigraphic sequences for individual areas (7) and combined with radiometric dates from samples returned from the lunar maria to establish a volcanic flux for the Moon as a whole (8). These SFD techniques can thus link specific mare crustal units to relative and absolute ages. For the highlands, on the other hand, crater densities are in the range N(20) = 100 to 280. These extremely high densities in the highlands are important because they fall in a range of ~3 to 10% of geometric saturation (9), consistent with empirical saturation equilibrium (10), a condition where, on average, every new crater erases a preexisting crater of comparable size. Because nearly all of the lunar highlands are in this range, our data further demonstrate that impact crater SFDs, unlike those in the younger maria, do not directly reflect differences in the actual age of the underlying crustal rocks. Examples of the most densely cratered surfaces on the Moon (Fig. 1C) illustrate this well: Crater densities in the north-central far-side are so high that addition of new craters over most of the size range does not measurably change the SFD (and thus the age), despite the fact that the crustal rocks themselves are likely to date from the most ancient period of lunar crustal genesis, a few hundred million years after lunar formation. Furthermore, slope maps of this area (Fig. 1D) show no evidence for extensive smooth areas such as intercrater plains, the type of volcanic resurfacing thought to have accompanied the early crustal history of Mercury (11). Such early volcanism could have occurred on the Moon (12) but is not now detectable by using SFD data because of crater saturation equilibrium. Conversely, these observations demonstrate that extrusive volcanism in early lunar history, if it occurred, was characterized by a flux low enough that it did not influence the crater population in a detectable manner.

Examination of the highlands impact crater density distribution (Fig. 1, A and B) does show regional variations, however. The interior and surroundings of stratigraphically young impact basins, especially Orientale, show N(20) numbers intermediate between the most heavily cratered highlands [N(20) = 150 to 250] and the lunar maria [N(20) = 25 to 50]. These data show that the proximity of a given region to young craters and basins was a key factor in establishing the local variations in crater density that is observed. This phenomenon results from the obliteration of craters below the impact basin itself, the burial of craters near the basin rim [in a process described as proximity weathering or degradation (13)], and their modification further away, by the dynamic emplacement of the basin ejecta. This process, proximity age resetting, results in selective loss of craters of different diameters as a function of the basin size and increasing radial range. For example, the formation of the 930-km-diameter Orientale Basin (Figs. 1B and 2A) resulted in the complete obliteration of craters below the basin (an area of 6.8 × 105 km2), and the demonstrable loss of craters ≥20 km diameter out to about 500-km radius from the basin rim crest (Fig. 2B). Within 100 km of the basin rim crest, the N(20) number decreased by ~74% compared with the regional background population, between 100 and 300 km by ~60% and between 300 to 500 km by ~19%, before returning to the regional average of ~N(20) = 160 at radial distances greater than ~500 km from the rim crest (Fig. 2B). Thus, detailed examination of the Orientale crater population (Figs. 1 and 2) shows that this single basin-forming event significantly altered the preexisting crater population, causing proximity age resetting out to a radial range of ~965 km from the basin center, an area comprising ~8% of the total lunar surface. Furthermore, analysis of Fig. 1B in the vicinity of Orientale Basin shows low-density lobes extending to the south over Mendel-Rydberg Basin and to the northwest toward Hertzsprung Basin, both of which predate Orientale but are relatively young stratigraphically.

681.jpg

Fig. 2. Orientale Basin and radial distribution of craters. (A) Distribution of craters in the surroundings of Orientale on LOLA hillshade base map. (B) N(20) cumulative crater density as a function of increasing radial range from the Orientale basin center.

In addition to obliterating craters, impact basin events also create large secondary craters at radial distances in excess of about one basin radius from the rim crest. These craters are predicted to be ~4% of the size of the primary (14) and known to range up to diameter (D) ~ 25 km for Orientale Basin (1). Thus, basins larger than Orientale could have produced even larger secondary craters and crater clusters. Indeed, basin secondary craters up to 20 to 40 km in diameter have been hypothesized to be an important part of the highland crater population, potentially polluting the primary impactor population and skewing surfaces to artificially older ages (15). To test this hypothesis, we performed an analysis similar to that shown in Fig. 2 for Orientale (D = 930 km), Imbrium (D = ~1160 km) and South Pole–Aitken (D ~ 2500 km) basins, centering the count areas on each basin and extending the annular analysis out to one basin diameter from the rim crest, an area known to contain radial ejecta and secondary crater chains and fields (1). As can be seen in the Orientale example (Fig. 2), the N(20) values for the range between 500 and 1000 km from the rim crest are similar to the N(20) values for typical, but not the most densely cratered, highlands (Fig. 1B). Similar relationships are seen for Imbrium and South Pole–Aitken basins. No annular zones of statistically significant increased crater density are observed, nor do secondaries traceable to these basins appear to contribute a significant number of craters ≥20 km to the crater population of surrounding regions.

We used the global crater database to revisit the SFD of important basins (Orientale, Imbrium, and Nectaris) that represent important markers within the lunar stratigraphy (1) and determined the superposed crater populations on these three basins (Fig. 3, A and B). Not surprisingly, the SFD plots (both R and cumulative) show a clear, separable distinction between these three basins, with Orientale and Imbrium being closer together in crater frequency than Imbrium and Nectaris. Our global data set, however, permits the use of buffered crater-counting techniques (16), and this results in a more robust SFD to be determined for these three important stratigraphic markers (see crosses in Fig. 3B). This enables a reanalysis of the sequence of basins proposed by Wilhelms (1) to lie between, and before, these key events. Further, should absolute age dates of key basin events be firmly established, these data will permit a more robust determination of the flux in early lunar history, and a test of the late heavy bombardment hypothesis (17).

683.jpg

Fig. 3. Crater size-frequency distributions. (A) R plot (21) and (B) cumulative plot of craters superposed on three important basin stratigraphic markers on the Moon, which are clearly separable in crater density. On the cumulative plot, for mare-filled basins Imbrium and Nectaris, relevant counts areas are computed in two ways that give a similar qualitative results: a traditional rim-area method [circles, also the data in (B)] and with a buffered crater counting correction (16) that allows inclusion craters on the margin of the mare that superpose the basin (hatches). © R plot (areal density) (21) of craters superposed on lunar nearside mare, Orientale, and representative highlands crust (outside South Pole–Aitken Basin), which illustrates the difference in density and SFD slope on these terrains (18).

Controversy has long existed concerning the nature of the impactor population bombarding inner planetary body surfaces throughout solar system history. Some hypothesize that the impactor population has been essentially similar in source and makeup throughout history, differing only in flux (18). Others have suggested that there is a clear difference in the populations with time and that this difference is reflected in the shape of the SFD of older and younger crater populations seen on planetary surfaces (6, 19). The global data set permits the assessment and testing of these hypotheses. For Orientale and the nearside mare, both of which are geologically young, we have extended our crater database to a minimum diameter of D = 8 km and examined stratigraphic relationships to ensure that measured craters are superposed on (postdate) these features.

Our data show a distinct difference between the shape of the SFD of the older highland and younger mare crater populations (Fig. 3C). The highlands have a greater density of large craters (D ~ 50 to 100 km) compared with small craters (e.g., D ~ 20 to 30 km) than the mare surfaces. This is consistent with a less-steep production function at this size range. We applied the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to assess the formal significance of this apparent difference in the shape of crater SFD on these units and found a very low probability that these SFD are the same distribution (P ~ 1.5 × 10–9). This difference is evident in our data both in the highlands as a whole, as well as in “pure” subregions of the highlands (20), which have been suggested as examples of the least modified cratered regions of the lunar crust. The SFD distribution of craters superposed on Orientale may be intermediate in nature, although it is statistically not distinguishable from the mare. These global observations show a change in the lunar SFD, consistent with observations on less comprehensive lunar data sets (6, 19). This supports the conclusions of Strom et al. (19), who hypothesized the existence of an early and a later impactor population inside the asteroid belt. Furthermore, it places the transition between these two populations at about the time of Orientale Basin, the last large multiringed basin thought to have formed ~3.8 billion years ago (1).
 
Back
Top